Straddling the Line: Government TDs Seek to Form a technical Group
In the Dáil, independent TDs and members of smaller parties often come together in groups of five or more to form what is known as a “technical group”. These groups allow them to secure speaking time, positions on committees, and the right to table questions or motions, privileges typically reserved for larger parties.
One of the key advantages of technical groups is their ability to participate in Leader’s Questions, where they can hold the government accountable by putting questions to the Taoiseach or Tánaiste.
Tho,Dáil rules stipulate that members of a technical group must be part of the opposition. This requirement is where the issue arises.
Michael Lowry, the Independent TD for Tipperary North, who played a key role in forming the current coalition government along with other members of the Regional Independent Group, believes they should still be able to form a technical group despite their involvement in the government.
What is their Proposal?
At a recent meeting of the Dáil’s Business Committee, a proposal was made to form a regional technical group. This would require the four members of the Regional Independent Group who are being appointed to junior or super junior minister positions, will resign from that group.
Mr Lowry,along with Barry Heneghan Gillian Toole who were also part of those talks,woule. 127, 27
Therefore, 27 } „.
december, 127 27 =.
{
}” 27.
.
{
} ..27: .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} .
{
} . {
What are the potential impacts of government TDs forming technical groups on the balance of power in the Dáil?
Archyde Exclusive Interview: Navigating the Dáil’s Technical Group Controversy with Political Analyst Dr. Fiona McAllister
Archyde: Good morning, Dr. McAllister, and thank you for joining us today. As a seasoned political analyst, you’ve closely followed developments in the Dáil. Recent discussions about government TDs seeking to form a technical group have sparked significant debate. Can you explain the importance of this proposal?
Dr. Fiona McAllister: Good morning,and thank you for having me. The proposal is highly significant because it challenges the long-standing rules of the Dáil.Traditionally, technical groups are formed by members of the opposition—autonomous tds or smaller parties—to secure speaking rights, committee positions, and the ability to participate in Leader’s Questions. This allows them to hold the government to account. though, the current proposal involves government-aligned independent TDs, like Michael Lowry and others from the Regional Independent Group, seeking to form a technical group. This blurs the line between government and opposition, raising questions about accountability and fairness.
Archyde: What’s driving this move by government TDs?
Dr. McAllister: It’s largely about influence and access. By forming a technical group, these TDs woudl gain a platform to raise issues directly with the taoiseach or Tánaiste during Leader’s Questions. It’s a way to amplify their voices and ensure their constituents’ concerns are heard at the highest levels. Though, this raises ethical concerns, as technical groups are meant to provide a check on the government, not to amplify its voice.
Archyde: The proposal suggests that four members of the Regional Independent Group would resign from their current group to form this new technical group. How would this impact the Dáil’s dynamics?
Dr. McAllister: It would create a unique—and possibly contentious—situation. On one hand, it could lead to more diverse voices being heard in the Dáil, which is positive. Conversely, it risks undermining the purpose of technical groups as a tool for opposition. If government TDs can form such groups, it could dilute the effectiveness of the opposition in holding the government accountable. Additionally,it could set a precedent for future governments,leading to further erosion of the distinction between government and opposition.
Archyde: Michael Lowry has been a key figure in these discussions. What does his involvement tell us about the current political landscape?
Dr. McAllister: michael Lowry’s role highlights the increasing influence of independent TDs in Irish politics. With the rise of smaller parties and independents,coalitions often rely on their support to form a government. This gives independents significant leverage,as seen in Mr. Lowry’s push for this technical group. However, it also raises questions about the balance of power and whether existing parliamentary rules need to be updated to reflect this new reality.
Archyde: What are the potential outcomes of this proposal?
Dr. McAllister: if approved, it could lead to greater depiction for regional issues and ensure that independents aligned with the government have a stronger voice. However,it could also spark backlash from opposition parties,who may view it as an unfair advantage for government TDs. There’s also the risk of legal challenges if the move is seen as violating Dáil rules. Alternatively, the proposal could be amended to limit technical groups to non-government members, preserving their customary role.
Archyde: As an analyst, what’s your personal view on this issue?
Dr. McAllister: While I understand the desire of these TDs to have a greater say in government, I believe technical groups should remain the domain of the opposition.They are a vital mechanism for ensuring checks and balances in the Dáil. Allowing government TDs to form such groups risks undermining this balance. Rather, efforts should focus on creating other avenues for government-aligned independents to raise concerns without compromising the integrity of the opposition’s role.
Archyde: Thank you, Dr. McAllister, for your insights. This is undoubtedly a complex issue, and we’ll be following its developments closely.
Dr. McAllister: Thank you. It’s a fascinating debate, and one that will likely shape the future of Irish politics.
Archyde: This concludes our interview. Stay tuned to Archyde for more in-depth analysis and updates on this story.
