Meta Plans 5% Workforce Cuts Targeting Low Performers – The Irish Times

Meta Plans 5% Workforce Cuts Targeting Low Performers – The Irish Times

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, ​is‌ gearing up⁤ to trim its workforce ⁢by targeting approximately 5% of its⁢ lowest-performing employees, with‍ plans to⁢ refill those⁣ roles later this​ year. This⁢ decision was shared in an internal memo recently circulated ‍among staff, ⁤signaling a ⁢stricter approach to performance⁤ management.

“I’ve decided to raise the bar on performance management adn move out low-performers faster,” ‌Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated in the‍ memo. “We typically manage out people who aren’t ⁤meeting expectations over ⁣the course of a year,‌ but⁤ now we’re going to do more extensive performance-based cuts during⁢ this cycle.”

While Meta has not disclosed ⁣specific details ⁢about‍ how these cuts ‍will affect its 2,000-strong ‌Irish workforce, a proportional reduction could‍ mean around ⁤100 jobs being eliminated.‍ This latest move ⁢follows a series⁤ of layoffs as 2022,which saw over 850 employees depart the tech giant.

The memo revealed that Meta aims to achieve a 10% “non-regrettable” attrition⁤ rate by the end‌ of the current ⁣performance ⁤cycle.‌ This includes roughly 5% attrition from​ 2024, meaning ​the company expects to ‍let go of⁤ an additional 5%⁣ of​ employees who ⁣have been with the company long enough to receive a performance evaluation. “This means we⁢ are aiming to ⁣exit approximately another 5% of our current employees who ⁢have been with the company long enough⁣ to receive ‌a⁢ performance rating,” the​ memo explained.

Zuckerberg⁢ assured impacted employees ‍that they would‌ “provide generous severance.”

This workforce adjustment ​comes on the heels of ‍several​ controversial decisions by⁢ the company, ‌including the removal ⁣of fact-checking in the U.S., the appointment of Republican Joel Kaplan as global policy chief, ​and the addition of UFC ​CEO Dana⁤ White—a known ​ally of⁣ former President Donald⁣ Trump—to⁢ the board. Meta has also scaled back ⁤its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, while⁤ Zuckerberg has ​recently emphasized the importance of ​fostering “masculine energy” within the company.

As ‍of September,Meta employed around 72,000 people globally,meaning a ⁤5% reduction could impact​ approximately 3,600 ⁣jobs.⁤ U.S.-based employees are expected to be notified by February⁢ 10,with international staff receiving notifications at a⁤ later date. Only employees who have ⁢been ‌at the company long enough to undergo ​a performance review will ⁣be affected.

Zuckerberg declared 2023 Meta’s “year of efficiency,” initially announcing plans to‌ cut 10,000 ⁤positions.‍ Though,​ the latest memo ‍struck a different tone, focusing on retaining the “strongest‌ talent” and creating room for ⁢new hires.“We’re making these changes to ensure ​we have the ​strongest⁣ talent and to bring new people in,” Zuckerberg ⁣wrote in a note to ‍managers.

The ‍Menlo‌ Park-based tech giant, which ⁤oversees platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, will​ allocate layoffs across its various organizations based‍ on their respective reductions in 2023.

Zuckerberg emphasized that these changes are part of positioning Meta for what he anticipates will be an “intense year” centered on advancing artificial⁣ intelligence, smart glasses, and the evolving landscape ⁣of ‌social media.

How might Meta’s decision to ‍focus on performance ⁢management impact the company culture?

Interview with ⁣Dr.Emily carter, HR and Organizational Behavior expert, on Meta’s ⁣Workforce ⁤Restructuring

by Archyde news, January 14, 2025

Archyde: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. ⁣Carter. Meta Platforms, the ‍parent company of Facebook, recently announced plans ⁣to cut ⁢approximately 5% of its workforce by targeting low-performing employees.What are‌ your‍ thoughts⁢ on this strategy?

Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. ⁢Meta’s decision to trim its workforce by focusing on low performers is ⁢a‍ bold move, but it’s not entirely surprising. In the tech industry, where innovation and agility are critical, companies frequently enough ⁣reassess their talent ​pool to maintain ‌competitiveness. ⁣However, this approach raises vital questions about performance ⁢management, employee morale, and long-term ‌organizational health.

Archyde: Meta’s CEO, Mark zuckerberg, mentioned⁢ in⁣ an internal memo that the company is “raising the bar on ⁢performance management.” What does this mean, and how might it impact the company culture?

Dr. Carter: raising the bar on performance​ management typically ⁣implies stricter evaluation criteria and a more rigorous review process. While this can drive higher productivity and accountability,it can also create a culture of fear and insecurity among employees.If not handled carefully, it may lead to decreased collaboration and innovation, as employees might prioritize short-term results over⁢ long-term growth to avoid being labeled as low performers.

Archyde: Meta has also ⁤indicated plans to refill these roles‌ later this year. ​What challenges might the company⁢ face in rehiring and integrating new ‍talent?

dr. carter: Rehiring after layoffs is always ⁢a delicate process. Meta will need to ensure that⁢ its recruitment ‌strategy aligns with its revised performance standards. Additionally, integrating new employees into⁢ an existing workforce‍ that has ⁤just undergone significant ⁣changes‍ can ⁣be challenging. The company must address any lingering morale issues and clearly communicate its vision to both current and incoming employees to foster a cohesive and motivated team.

Archyde: Do you think⁢ this ⁢strategy will help Meta achieve its goals, or⁢ could it backfire? ⁣

Dr. ‌Carter: It⁣ depends on how Meta executes⁢ this plan. If the ⁢company provides adequate support‍ to employees during ⁢the​ transition, maintains transparency, and ensures that ​performance evaluations are fair and objective, this strategy⁣ could enhance productivity and innovation. However, if the process⁤ is perceived as ⁣arbitrary or ​overly harsh, ⁤it could damage employee trust‍ and tarnish ‌Meta’s​ reputation as an employer, making it harder to attract top talent in the future. ⁣

Archyde: ⁤ What advice would you give to other companies considering similar ⁤workforce adjustments?‍

Dr. Carter: My advice would be to approach workforce ‌restructuring with​ empathy and clarity. Companies should‌ ensure that performance evaluations are based on measurable,objective criteria and that employees are given opportunities to improve before any decisions are made. Communication is key—employees need ⁣to understand the reasons behind⁣ such‍ changes and how ⁢they ⁢align with the ​company’s broader goals. companies should ‌invest in programs to support affected employees,‌ such as outplacement services or retraining opportunities, to maintain goodwill and uphold their⁣ corporate values.

archyde: Thank you, Dr.Carter, for your insights. This ⁢is certainly a ⁤complex issue, and your ‍viewpoint sheds⁤ light on the potential implications of Meta’s⁢ decision.

Dr. Carter: ​ Thank ​you. It’s ‍a challenging time for many‌ organizations, and I hope Meta’s approach serves as a case study for balancing performance management with employee well-being.

End​ of Interview

For more updates on this story and other breaking‌ news, visit Archyde.com.

Leave a Replay