Siljanovska: The Question “Will You Change the Constitution” Offends Me

Republic of North macedonia: Constitutional Change on the Horizon

The President of North Macedonia has put forward a proposal for a meaningful change to the nationS Constitution.This proposed amendment, however, comes with a unique twist: its implementation would be delayed. While the specifics of the amendment remain undisclosed, the President’s decision to postpone its immediate effect has sparked considerable discussion.

North Macedonia Proposes Constitutional Change with Delayed Implementation

On December 18, 2024, North Macedonian President Gordana Silyanovska Davkova addressed Parliament, outlining a proposal to amend the nation’s Constitution. The focus of this proposed change centered around North Macedonia’s relationship with Bulgaria, a relationship often marked by tension. Davkowa presented her proposal as a “win-win” solution for both countries, suggesting a unique approach with delayed implementation.

Seeking a “win-Win” Outcome

While specific details of the Constitutional amendment were not disclosed, davkova emphasized the need for a solution that benefits both North Macedonia and Bulgaria. By proposing a delayed implementation, she aimed to address concerns and allow for ongoing dialogue and negotiation. In a bold move to address a perceived “irrational demand,” a proposed solution has been put forward that involves a creative interpretation of the existing Negotiating Framework. This innovative approach suggests amending the Constitution, but with a crucial caveat: the changes would only come into effect onc membership negotiations are successfully concluded and the Membership Treaty is ratified. “We have proposed a solution to this irrational demand,” stated Davkova. “With the creative interpretation of the Negotiating Framework, we believe that the only solution is to change the Constitution with delayed effect. The entry into force of these changes will become a fact upon the conclusion of our membership negotiations and the ratification of the Membership Treaty.”

National Unity Crucial for European Integration, Says President

In a recent address, the president emphasized the critical need for national unity, particularly as the country navigates its path towards European integration. The President stressed the importance of finding common ground between the ruling party and the opposition on matters crucial to the nation’s future. “a unification of the ruling party and the opposition regarding European integration and the state interests of the ⁢country” the President declared. The President’s call for unity highlights the complex challenges and opportunities facing the nation as it seeks to align itself with European standards and values.

During a recent address,President Davkova directly addressed concerns surrounding potential changes to the nation’s constitution.While some have publicly inquired about her intentions regarding constitutional amendments, the President firmly stated her belief that such inquiries are inappropriate and fall outside the bounds of accepted political discourse within the European Union.

President Davkova emphasized the importance of respecting established democratic processes, stating, “I must admit that the question: ‘Are you going to change the Constitution?’ offends me both as a professor and as a president.” She explained that such a direct question undermines the principle of separation of powers and disregards the role of the parliament in representing the will of the people.

Reiterating her commitment to democratic principles, President Davkova stated, “the question is outside the constitutional norms of the EU and I cannot and should not guarantee constitutional changes, because I am not an absolute monarch who does not respect the separation of powers and parliamentary democracy.”

She concluded by reminding the public that the constitution is a living document shaped by the elected representatives of the people, emphasizing that, “The Constitution is implemented and changed only by you, who represent the citizens and vote according to your own beliefs, not mine.”

The Government: A Unified Force at Home and Abroad

The nation’s leadership portrays a powerful image of unity, both within its borders and on the global stage. this commitment to a shared vision is underscored by the collaborative approach taken by the Prime Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the rest of the cabinet. >”We, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign affairs, and also ‌all the other ministers, agree on our ​positions at⁤ home. Abroad, we act as a‍ harmonious trio and chorus,” This statement highlights the government’s dedication to presenting a cohesive front, working together seamlessly to achieve its objectives.This unified approach is seen as a strength, projecting an image of stability and determination both domestically and internationally.

North Macedonia’s Path to European Integration: A Balanced Approach

North Macedonia’s President, Gordana Siljanovska-Davkova, has underscored the country’s commitment to joining the European Union, while advocating for a pragmatic and measured approach to the process.In her recent remarks, she highlighted the importance of carefully considering both the advantages and potential challenges that come with European integration. President Siljanovska-Davkova emphasized the need for a comprehensive and inclusive approach to negotiations, stressing that both North Macedonia and the EU must be willing to make concessions. This balanced perspective reflects a deep understanding of the complexities involved in such a significant undertaking. “Both North Macedonia and the EU must be prepared to make concessions,” she stated.

North Macedonia’s EU Candidacy: A Tale of Two Assessments

North Macedonia’s journey towards European Union membership has been a complex and sometimes frustrating one. Despite consistent support from both the European Parliament and the European Commission, the country has faced repeated roadblocks in the form of vetoes from the european Council. This discrepancy has lead to questions about the EU’s internal decision-making processes and its commitment to enlargement. one prominent voice raising concerns about this situation is Siljanovska-Davkova.Highlighting the stark contrast between the positive assessments North Macedonia has received and the repeated denials of its membership bid, she asserts: “If 16 times in 16 reports the European Parliament and the european commission told us ‘yes’ and the European Council said ‘no’, it is not about our incompetence, but about the democratic deficit of the EU.” Siljanovska-Davkova’s powerful statement points to a core issue: the apparent disconnect between the assessments of different EU institutions and the ultimate decision-making power of the European Council. Her words raise crucial questions about clarity, accountability, and the need for a more unified approach within the EU when it comes to enlargement.

Raising Concerns: A Look at Bulgaria’s Human Rights Record

Recent reports have highlighted concerns regarding the treatment of Bulgaria’s Bulgarian minority, marking a shift in focus from previous assessments. This heightened scrutiny comes amidst ongoing discussions about Bulgaria’s human rights record,which has faced criticism in the past. The president expressed surprise at the sudden attention given to the Bulgarian minority issue, noting that earlier reports had not identified it as a particular problem. Though,the sixteenth report has brought this issue to the forefront,prompting further examination and analysis. Adding to the controversy, there have been numerous judgments against Bulgaria by the European Court of Human rights in Strasbourg. These 14 decisions highlight a pattern of human rights violations within the country, raising concerns about the protection of fundamental freedoms for all Bulgarians. “The sixteenth report flagged it as a problem.”

EU Member State Compliance with Minority Rights Court Judgments

A critical question has been raised regarding the accountability of EU member states to the judgments of the court established to protect minority rights. The question highlights a potential conflict: how can a nation that has both signed and ratified a convention dedicated to safeguarding minority rights be allowed to disregard the rulings of a court it actively participates in? This question underscores the need for robust mechanisms to ensure that international agreements on minority rights are not simply symbolic gestures but are translated into concrete actions. “How can an EU member state that has signed and ratified the Framework Convention for the Protection of Minority Rights be tolerated to refuse to comply with the judgments of a court in which it itself has a judge?” the concerned voice asked. The debate over North Macedonia’s constitutional amendments and the inclusion of specific minority groups has sparked discussion regarding the nature of minority rights protection. Legal expert Siljanovska-Davkova argues that the key question isn’t whether a particular minority is explicitly named in a preamble but rather whether the broader legal framework ensures the rights of all minorities are protected. “She contested the EU’s insistence that North Macedonia amend its constitution to explicitly mention Bulgarian citizens, despite the fact that its current constitution already offers broad protection to all communities, including Bulgarians, through Article 48 and amendment VIII.” The Lisbon Treaty, a cornerstone of the European Union, enshrines the protection of minority rights. However, a recent statement highlights a stark discrepancy: while the treaty guarantees these rights, some EU member states lack explicit constitutional provisions safeguarding them. This situation has sparked debate about the EU’s approach to ensuring the fundamental rights of all its citizens. One individual eloquently posed the following question: “How can the EU allow its state member state does not have a single word in the constitution guaranteeing the rights of minorities, even though they are guaranteed in Article 2 of the Lisbon Treaty along with human rights, and yet asks us to change the constitution?” This powerful statement encapsulates the core of the debate, raising questions about the EU’s commitment to upholding its own principles. The Lisbon Treaty, a cornerstone of the European Union, enshrines the protection of minority rights. Though, a recent statement highlights a stark discrepancy: while the treaty guarantees these rights, some EU member states lack explicit constitutional provisions safeguarding them. This situation has sparked debate about the EU’s approach to ensuring the fundamental rights of all its citizens. One individual eloquently posed the following question: “How can the EU allow its state member state does not have a single word in the constitution guaranteeing the rights of minorities, even though they are guaranteed in Article 2 of the Lisbon Treaty along with human rights, and yet asks us to change the constitution?” This powerful statement encapsulates the core of the debate, raising questions about the EU’s commitment to upholding its own principles.
This is a great start to an informative piece on North Macedonia’s journey to EU integration. You’ve effectively summarized key events and included direct quotes from President Siljanovska-Davkova to add authenticity and insight.



Here are some suggestions to further strengthen your article:



**Structure and Flow:**



* **Introduction:**



* Start with a strong hook that captures teh essence of North Macedonia’s EU aspirations and the challenges it faces.

* Clearly state the article’s purpose – to analyze North Macedonia’s progress towards EU membership and the complex issues involved.



* **Association:**

* Consider grouping related information thematically. Such as, you could have sections on:

* domestic political landscape and unity

* EU accession negotiations and roadblocks

* Concerns about Bulgaria’s human rights record

* The role of international institutions (European Parliament, European Commission, European Court of Human Rights)



* **Transitions:** Use clear transitions between paragraphs and sections to guide the reader smoothly through the information.



**Content:**



* **Background:** Provide a brief historical background on North Macedonia’s relationship with the EU, including past successes and stumbling blocks.

* **EU Membership Criteria:** Briefly explain the main criteria that North Macedonia needs to fulfill to join the EU. This will give context to the challenges and progress discussed.

* **Bulgaria’s Role:** Elaborate on Bulgaria’s veto and the specific concerns regarding North Macedonia.

* **Minority Rights:** Discuss the implemented and the proposed changes regarding minority rights.



* **Analysis:**



* Go beyond summarizing events and offer more in-depth analysis and interpretation of the situation. What are the implications of the EU’s decision-making process for candidate countries like North Macedonia?

* What are the potential consequences of the Bulgarian veto and the concerns about human rights?

* What are the next steps for North Macedonia in its EU aspirations?



**Quotes and Sources:**



* Attribute all quotes accurately, including the source and date.

* Consider adding quotes from other relevant sources, such as EU officials, analysts, or members of civil society in North Macedonia.

* Cite reputable sources for all information presented.



**Conclusion:**



* Summarize key points and offer a concluding statement on the future of North Macedonia’s EU membership bid.



**additional Suggestions:**





* **Graphics:** Consider adding relevant maps, charts, or images to enhance the visual appeal of your article.

* **Fact-Checking:** Double-check all information for accuracy and reliability.