Rapper Digga D took up cannabis at 12, Lincoln court hears

UK Rapper Digga D‘s Cannabis Import Case: A Trial of Issue

British drill star Digga D, whose real ‌name is Rhys⁣ Herbert, has found himself at the center of a legal battle concerning cannabis importation. The 24-year-old ⁢musician admitted to smuggling 3kg (6.6 lbs) of the Class B ‌drug into the UK following an arrest near Lincoln‌ on February 21st. The arrest took place in the early hours while Herbert was live-streaming ​on Instagram.

Drill rapper Digga D singing into⁣ a wireless microphone. His hair is in thick braids and he is wearing a black jacket over a black t-shirt ‍and a thick gold chain necklace.

Herbert pleaded guilty to charges ⁣of smuggling cannabis relating to july 11th, 2023, and ⁤supplying cannabis ‍between October 26th, 2022, and February 21st, 2024. Though, during a “Newton Hearing” – a trial of issue to determine the facts⁤ of the case – Herbert denied importing up to 60kg (132 lbs) of cannabis ⁤with the intent to sell.

Interestingly, Herbert explained in court that he began using ⁣cannabis at the age of 12 to manage frequent migraines. This detail⁣ may‍ play a role in the judge’s final decision regarding his case.

⁤UK drill rapper Digga D, also known as Rhys Herbert, appeared ​in court this week for a two-day hearing concerning drug dealing charges. The proceedings took place before Judge simon Hirst, who will determine the⁣ level of Herbert’s involvement after the prosecution rejected the ‌basis of his pleas.

Herbert, who is currently on remand at HMP Wormwood Scrubs, gave testimony via video link. He stated that he​ began using cannabis at the⁣ age of 12 and ⁤continued throughout his teenage years, claiming it helped alleviate frequent migraines.

The court learned that ⁣Herbert’s considerable‍ earnings, reportedly exceeding £3 million ​at the time of⁤ the alleged offenses, allowed him to buy cannabis ⁣in bulk,⁣ which he described as‌ cost-effective.

During the proceedings, prosecutors presented​ a message from⁢ Herbert’s phone that they interpreted as referring to the importation ⁣of approximately 18 kg of cannabis. The message referenced “40 in the air,” suggesting a large-scale drug operation.

Rising Music Star Faces Drug Charges in Court

A popular young musician is facing drug charges after authorities alleged he was involved in the commercial supply of cannabis. ⁤The 24-year-old artist, widely known for his hit songs and online presence with millions ⁢of views, appeared​ in court to deny the accusations. The musician defended himself by stating that he acquired cannabis for use in a music video, claiming it was a “fictional chat” and denying knowledge of a significant quantity of drugs entering‌ the country. He further explained that buying cannabis ‍in bulk ⁤was a way to avoid unwanted ⁤attention from law enforcement, which he frequently experienced due to his public profile ‌and frequent travels. Prosecutors, ​however, painted a different picture,⁢ alleging the musician was involved in commercial drug transactions involving up to ⁢60 kilograms of cannabis. They claimed he sold approximately 5 kilograms of the Class B drug sporadically, making a modest profit of £300 to £400 per deal. Evidence presented in court included weighing scales,a cannabis grinder‌ recovered from the musician’s London residence,and mobile phone footage allegedly showing him handling cannabis and expressing dissatisfaction with its quality. Prosecutors also presented photographs ​depicting the musician handling large sums of cash. The musician’s legal representative emphasized his international ⁣recognition as a musician with legitimate income, pointing out that his music videos often featured large amounts of cash. The hearing was adjourned, with ⁣the judge expected to deliver a ruling and sentence on ⁢January 31st.
##⁢ exclusive Interview with Legal Expert on ​the‌ Digga D Case



**archyde:** Welcome to Archyde. Today, we’re⁢ discussing ⁤the ongoing legal battle surrounding UK drill rapper Digga D, ‌whose ​real⁤ name is Rhys ​herbert. He’s facing charges related to cannabis importation adn supply. Joining us is [Name of Legal Expert], a renowned criminal defense ⁤lawyer with extensive experience in ​drug-related cases. Thanks for being here.



**Legal Expert:** It’s a pleasure to be here.



**Archyde:** Digga D has​ admitted⁤ to smuggling 3kg ⁢of cannabis but denies importing up to 60kg with ‍intent to‍ supply. How significant‍ is this ⁢discrepancy in the context of his case?



**Legal Expert:** This discrepancy is crucial. The prosecution’s case‌ hinges on proving intent.Admitting to the smaller amount doesn’t automatically mean ‌he ​intended to distribute the larger⁢ quantity. The defense ‍will likely argue that​ the​ 3kg was for personal use, especially considering his claim of using cannabis‍ to​ manage migraines as childhood due to a history of⁤ serious headaches.



**Archyde:** ⁣ Captivating point ⁣about the⁢ migraines⁤ and‍ self-medication. Could this play a role in the judge’s decision?



**Legal Expert:** It could perhaps be a mitigating factor. Judges often consider the defendant’s ​personal circumstances, ⁤including any⁤ underlying health issues. However, it ⁤depends on the strength of the evidence regarding the ⁣larger quantity. ‍The prosecution will try to present evidence linking ‌him to‌ the larger ​import, potentially through⁣ witnesses, financial records,​ or interaction intercepts.



**Archyde:** Digga D claims he bought cannabis in bulk due to his relatively‌ high earnings. Could this financial situation work against him?



**legal expert:** Perhaps. While it doesn’t ⁢directly imply intent to supply, it could suggest he was ⁣engaging in large-scale purchases that surpass what would be considered typical personal ​use.⁢ The prosecution might use ​this to argue he​ was buying to sell.



**Archyde:**⁢ This case⁢ has garnered significant media attention due to Digga D’s popularity. Do you ‍think this will ​impact⁢ the proceedings in ⁣any way?



**Legal⁢ Expert:** High-profile⁤ cases always ‌attract scrutiny, but judges are expected‌ to remain impartial. They are trained to ‍base their decisions solely⁣ on the evidence presented in court. However, public perception can influence the sentencing even if it doesn’t directly impact the ‍guilty or ​not guilty verdict.



**archyde:** What possible outcomes do you foresee for this⁤ case?



**Legal ‌Expert:** It’s tough to⁢ say ‍with certainty.⁢ Much depends on the strength of the ⁣prosecution’s‍ evidence regarding the larger ⁢quantity and the judge’s ⁢interpretation of Digga D’s testimony about his personal use and migraines. ​he⁣ could potentially face⁤ a range of outcomes, from a suspended sentence to imprisonment, depending ⁣on the‍ severity of the judge’s findings.



**Archyde:** Thank you⁤ for providing your expert insights‍ on‍ this case.



**Legal Expert:** My pleasure.



**Archyde:**⁣ Stay ‍tuned⁣ to Archyde for further developments in the ‍Digga D​ case.

This is a great start to an article about Digga D’s legal case. You’ve included relevant information,quotes,and context. Here are some suggestions for further advancement:



**Adding Depth & Analysis**



* **Expand on legal complexities:** Delve deeper into the specifics of the charges against Herbert. Explain the nuances of “smuggling” versus “supply” and what constitutes a “large-scale” operation in this context.



* **explore potential defenses:** Discuss the effectiveness of Herbert’s claims about using cannabis for migraines and bulk purchases for cost-effectiveness. How might these arguments be perceived by the court?

* **Analyze prosecution evidence:** Highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution’s evidence. Are there any potential loopholes or challenges to their claims?



* **Discuss potential sentencing:** Research typical sentences for offenses of this nature. What factors might influence the judge’s decision in Herbert’s case?

* **Contextualize within the music industry:** Explore the broader issue of drug use and legal trouble within the UK drill scene. Are there underlying societal issues contributing to these cases?



**Structuring the Interview**



* **prepare specific questions:** Craft incisive questions for your legal expert that encourage insightful responses. For example:



* How strong is the prosecution’s case based on the evidence presented?

* What are the likely legal challenges ‘Digga D’s’ defense team will raise?

* How might ‘Digga D’s’ public profile and musical career influence the court’s perception of him?

* What are the potential ramifications for ‘Digga D’s’ career irrespective of the verdict?



* **Include your own analysis:** Don’t just relay the expert’s opinion. Offer your own analysis and perspectives on the case, legal precedents, and broader implications.



**Adding Further Elements**





* **Include quotes from legal experts/analysts:** Offer diverse perspectives by including quotes from legal experts outside your interviewed Alex Reed.



* **Embed multimedia:** Consider adding relevant video clips from court hearings,news reports,or even excerpts from Digga D’s music.

* **Fact-check thoroughly:** Double-check all facts, figures, and legal terms for accuracy.



By incorporating these suggestions,you can transform your draft into a comprehensive and engaging article that offers a nuanced understanding of this high-profile case.