Bill to fund the government through March 14 unveiled but Johnson’s dealmaking with Democrats angers conservatives

Bill to fund the government through March 14 unveiled but Johnson’s dealmaking with Democrats angers conservatives

Government ⁤Funding Extended to March ‌Amidst ⁢Political Tensions

Washington lawmakers ‌reached an agreement on a ‌temporary spending bill late Tuesday, aimed at averting a government shutdown and extending funding until March 14, 2025. The bill, which allocates $100 billion in disaster relief and includes other key provisions, ‍is expected to pass, but‌ not without ⁢controversy.

The deal postpones major spending ⁤discussions until after President-elect⁣ Donald Trump takes⁢ office, possibly leading to a showdown early in his governance. Negotiations were‍ fraught ‍with disagreement as both parties ⁢sought ⁢to prioritize their own legislative goals. Democrats pushed for disaster relief funding, a priority for⁤ the Biden administration, while Republicans sought farm aid, ultimately ⁢securing $10 billion‌ in economic assistance for farmers.

House Speaker ⁢Mike Johnson ​faced strong criticism from within his ​own party regarding the late-December deal with Democrats. Many ‌Republicans expressed frustration over the numerous provisions added to a bill ⁤initially intended solely for extending ⁤current funding levels and ‍preventing a shutdown.

The bill, if ⁤passed, will⁣ present a significant challenge for ⁢johnson, incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune, and President-elect Trump.Their ability to‌ navigate‌ these complex budget⁤ negotiations early in the new ‍year will be a crucial early test ⁣of their governing⁤ capabilities.

Congress Approves Massive Funding Bill ‌with a Focus on Disaster Relief

Congress passed a massive funding bill totaling nearly $1 ‍trillion, with a substantial portion earmarked for⁢ disaster relief efforts⁣ across the nation. The bipartisan agreement, struck just days before the looming end-of-year deadline, ​provides a much-needed financial lifeline to communities ravaged by​ natural disasters. The bill allocates nearly $100 billion for‍ disaster relief, including​ $29 billion for FEMA’s disaster relief fund and $2.2​ billion for the Small​ Business Administration’s⁢ disaster loan program.‌ Farmers, who have suffered significant losses ⁢due to hurricanes, droughts, and other calamities, will receive $21 billion in disaster relief, with $10 billion‌ specifically designated for ‌economic assistance. “This funding is critical to help‌ communities recover and rebuild after​ devastating natural disasters,” saeid a congressional leader involved in the negotiations. Beyond disaster relief, the bill also includes significant funding for infrastructure, ‌with $12 billion allocated to a Department of Housing and Urban ‌Development program and $8 billion ‍dedicated to federal highway and roads disaster relief. The passage of this⁢ bill marks a major ⁢legislative achievement ‍in a divided Congress, demonstrating a ‍commitment to addressing the pressing needs of communities across the contry.

house Spending‌ Bill Faces​ Opposition from GOP Members

A spending bill aimed⁤ at averting a government shutdown is facing significant​ resistance from within the republican​ party. Despite leadership efforts to ⁤secure passage, several ⁤GOP lawmakers have voiced strong criticism‍ of the bill, raising doubts about its viability. Concerns center on ‌the bill’s content, which some Republicans deem bloated and laden with unneeded provisions. GOP‌ Representative Eli Crane of Arizona‍ labelled it⁣ a “complete monstrosity,” expressing dissatisfaction with the handling of the legislative process.crane, who was ‌among the eight republicans who ousted ‍former Speaker Kevin McCarthy last year, stated unequivocally that he would not support the spending bill. When asked about his stance on Johnson’s potential ​Speakership bid, Crane remained noncommittal, stating, “We’ll see about January⁤ 3.” Representative tim Burchett, another Republican‌ who contributed to McCarthy’s downfall, echoed Crane’s sentiment, characterizing the leadership’s ⁢approach to government funding as “gutless.” Burchett accused leadership of attaching unrelated and⁤ undesirable⁤ measures to⁣ essential ​funding legislation, deriding it as a tactic to force through unpopular items. These strong dissenting voices within the Republican ranks ​cast a shadow⁢ of doubt over the spending bill’s prospects. With key GOP‍ members expressing staunch opposition, the bill’s passage faces a significant hurdle.

House Speaker Hopeful Faces Conservative Backlash Over Spending ‌Deal

Republican Kevin⁤ McCarthy, vying for ​the Speakership,​ is​ facing pushback from⁤ conservative members of ‍his party over a proposed year-end spending⁢ deal. ⁢ Many‌ conservatives feel‌ that McCarthy⁣ has conceded too ‌much to ⁣Democrats, resulting in a large spending package​ that he had previously promised to ⁣avoid. “it is a ⁣total dumpster fire,” Missouri Rep. Eric Burlison stated,⁢ expressing his frustration with McCarthy and declining to commit​ his ‍support⁤ for‌ McCarthy in the upcoming Speaker vote in January. While the vocal opposition from these ​conservatives⁣ might not directly impact the spending deal’s passage, it serves ‍as a clear warning to McCarthy. Their disapproval suggests that this week’s funding fight could substantially influence the outcome of the Speakership election next month. South⁢ Carolina‍ Rep. Ralph Norman ‌echoed this sentiment when asked if the funding bill would affect his support for McCarthy:‍ “We’ll see. Everything’s​ got consequences.” mccarthy ‍and his allies ⁤have been actively working to appease conservatives amidst ongoing negotiations. He ‌recently met with the House Freedom Caucus to discuss the spending⁤ details and prevent a conservative revolt.‍ members, including⁢ Rep. Byron Donalds, clamor for access to the full text of the‌ deal, stating,‌ “We got a lot of questions.” Donalds highlighted ‍the fundamental concern⁤ among conservatives: “A deal put together like this,⁢ the number ⁣one question is, ‘What ⁣did the ⁢other side⁤ get?’”

Government Funding Deal ⁣Stalls Over Farm ⁤Aid Dispute

Negotiations for‌ a ​crucial government funding deal are facing a last-minute hurdle as lawmakers struggle to reach⁢ an agreement on financial assistance for farmers. With a Friday ⁢deadline looming, the ⁣stalemate ‍threatens to push Congress into‍ a‍ potentially damaging shutdown. While negotiators hoped to finalize the ⁢deal over ‌the weekend, disagreements over the inclusion of farm aid have intricate ‍matters.‍ Republicans are pushing for additional funding to⁤ support struggling agricultural producers, ​while Democrats⁢ are ​demanding concessions in return. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise⁢ emphasized the ‌urgency of the situation, stating, ‌“There’s the potential for a lot of foreclosures to happen⁣ by the end of⁢ this year,‌ so it’s an imminent threat‌ that has to be addressed before⁣ the end of the year if‍ we’re going to maintain family farms across America.” Republican Representative Frank ​Lucas, a former‌ chairman ‍of ⁣the House Agriculture Committee, underscored the ​importance of supporting rural ⁢America. “From the outlook ‍of the political crowd, of course, rural America is and has‍ been for a ‌long time⁤ Republican, ‍so this ‍conference has a responsibility to address those needs, not just because of the political‌ base‍ but because those farmers feed the United​ States and the world.” Though,‍ not all Republicans agree with the approach of offering concessions to secure ⁣farm aid. Representative Chip Roy of Texas believes Republicans shoudl have taken a harder stance and forced ⁢Democrats to⁤ vote against the measure.”if I was⁤ doing this, ⁣I would make Democrats ‍vote down farm aid,” ⁣Roy ​said. “Put it ‌on the floor, actually go down and‍ legislate…​ So ⁢rather, ‌we get ⁤this negotiated⁤ crap and we’re forced‍ to eat this crap sandwich – why? As fricking Christmas is right around‌ the corner. It’s the same dang thing every​ year, legislate by crisis, legislate by ⁤calendar, not legislate because it’s the⁤ right thing to do.”​

When it comes to customizing WordPress website URLs, understanding⁢ the platform’s​ rewrite system is key. WordPress leverages a system ⁤akin to mod_rewrite used on apache servers, offering adaptability through PHP-based rules within ​the⁢ .htaccess ⁢file.

This ⁤approach allows for a high degree of ⁤control over how URLs are structured and displayed. ⁤

[[1](https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/wordpress-url-rewrite/) ]

When it comes to customizing WordPress website URLs, understanding⁢ the platform’s​ rewrite system is key. WordPress leverages a system ⁤akin to mod_rewrite used on apache servers, offering adaptability through PHP-based rules within ​the⁢ .htaccess ⁢file.

This ⁤approach allows for a high degree of ⁤control over how URLs are structured and displayed. ⁤

[[1](https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/wordpress-url-rewrite/) ]

Leave a Replay