15 million for presidential library

15 million for presidential library
## Teh Perils of a Code Rewrite: Can Technology Be Its Own Worst Enemy? Its a daunting task, rewriting an existing codebase. While it might seem like a path to modernization and improvement, history offers a cautionary tale. Technology’s quest for progress has often been hindered by the very tools it wields.This is the story of how code rewrites, intended as solutions, can morph into notable roadblocks. ## The Political Landscape of Code The impact of a code rewrite resonates far beyond the digital realm.It has the potential to ripple through political spheres, as seen in various instances.Decisions about which systems to overhaul, which features to prioritize, and whose voices are heard in the process become inherently political. ## A Legacy in Code: The Case of Presidential Libraries Even institutions as esteemed as presidential libraries have been caught in the crosshairs of code rewrites. These repositories of history, entrusted with preserving vital records, have faced challenges when attempting to modernize their digital infrastructure. The process of migrating vast amounts of data, ensuring accessibility, and maintaining the integrity of historical records during a code rewrite is a monumental task with significant consequences.

The Dangers of a Complete Code Rewrite

In the dynamic world of software advancement, few decisions are as risky as undertaking a complete code rewrite. It may seem enticing to wipe the slate clean and start afresh, but history is littered with cautionary tales of projects that were derailed by this seemingly straightforward act. Legendary programmer joel Spolsky recounted one such tale, offering a sobering glimpse into the potential pitfalls of this approach.

“One of the very worst things that a company can do is to permanently destroy a large body of working code”

Spolsky’s words serve as a stark warning against the allure of a complete rewrite. He emphasizes that discarding a functional, albeit perhaps imperfect, codebase can have disastrous consequences. It’s crucial to carefully weigh the risks and potential rewards before embarking on such a drastic measure.

Securing Your WordPress Site: Switching from HTTP to HTTPS

Switching your WordPress site from HTTP to HTTPS is a crucial step in ensuring website security. HTTPS encrypts interaction between your website and visitors’ browsers, protecting sensitive data like login credentials and personal information from interception by malicious actors. This transition is not only essential for safeguarding user trust but also a ranking factor for search engines like Google.

Implementing the Switch

While the process may seem daunting, several methods can help you seamlessly transition your WordPress site to HTTPS. Plugins can automate much of the process, simplifying configuration and minimizing potential errors.

15 million for presidential library

Remember to thoroughly test your website after the switch to ensure all elements are working correctly.

The Perils of a Complete Code Rewrite

In the world of software development, a complete code rewrite frequently enough seems like a tempting solution. The allure of a “fresh start” can be intoxicating,especially when faced with legacy code riddled with inefficiencies and technical debt. However, history is littered with cautionary tales of companies that embarked on such ambitious projects, only to find themselves mired in a quagmire of delays, spiraling costs, and ultimately, failure. One such story was recounted by software development luminary Joel Spolsky in his insightful article, “Things You Should Never Do, Part I”. He detailed the catastrophic consequences suffered by a company, which he chose to refer to only as “The Company,” after they opted for a complete rewrite of their existing codebase.
“They decided to rewrite the code from scratch.” “They did it by making the single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make.”
Spolsky’s words serve as a stark warning to any company contemplating a similar move.The decision to fully rewrite code should never be taken lightly. It’s a complex undertaking fraught with risk.

The Perils of a Code Rewrite

software development, despite its seemingly straightforward nature, is a process riddled with complexities. Even well-intended decisions, such as opting for a complete rewrite of the codebase, can have unforeseen and frequently enough disastrous consequences. The temptation of a fresh start is powerful, but the reality of a code rewrite is frequently enough far less appealing. Developers may find themselves entangled in a web of technical hurdles, unexpected intricacies, and the potential loss of valuable knowledge embedded within the existing code. It’s a risky undertaking, one that demands careful consideration and a thorough understanding of the potential pitfalls.

ABC News Settles defamation Lawsuit with President-Elect Trump

In a significant legal development, ABC News has reached a settlement agreement with President-Elect Donald Trump regarding a defamation lawsuit. The terms of the agreement include a considerable financial payout to the Trump presidential library, along with a public apology issued online by the network. As part of the settlement,ABC News will contribute $15 million to the Trump presidential library. In addition, the network has agreed to pay $1 million to cover Trump’s legal expenses associated with the case.

Online Apology Included

further emphasizing their commitment to resolving the matter, ABC News has also committed to publishing a formal apology online, acknowledging the defamation claims made by President-Elect Trump. The details surrounding the specific content and placement of the online apology have not yet been publicly disclosed.

ABC News Settles Defamation Lawsuit with President-Elect Trump

In a significant legal development, ABC News has reached a settlement agreement with President-Elect Donald Trump regarding a defamation lawsuit. The terms of the agreement include a substantial financial payout to the Trump presidential library, along with a public apology issued online by the network. As part of the settlement,ABC News will contribute $15 million to the Trump presidential library. In addition, the network has agreed to pay $1 million to cover Trump’s legal expenses associated with the case.

Online Apology Included

Further emphasizing their commitment to resolving the matter, ABC News has also committed to publishing a formal apology online, acknowledging the defamation claims made by President-Elect Trump. The details surrounding the specific content and placement of the online apology have not yet been publicly disclosed.
## Q&A: The Dangers of Code rewrite





**Q: Why are code rewrites frequently enough seen as risky?**



**A:** Code rewrites are inherently risky as they involve discarding a potentially working, albeit imperfect, codebase. This can lead to unforeseen complications, delays, and increased costs. As joel Spolsky famously said, “One of the very worst things that a company can do is to permanently destroy a large body of working code.”



**Q: Can you give an example of a company that suffered from a disastrous code rewrite?**



**A:** Joel Spolsky recounted the story of “The Company,” which he chose to anonymize, in his article “Things You Should Never Do, Part I.” They decided to completely rewrite their codebase and faced catastrophic consequences, highlighting the potential pitfalls of such a decision.



**Q: What are some alternatives to a complete code rewrite?**



**A:** There are often less risky alternatives to a complete rewrite, such as:



* **Refactoring:** Improving the existing code’s structure and organization without changing its functionality.

* **Incremental Upgrades:** Gradually updating specific modules or components of the existing codebase.

* **Microservices:** Breaking down the application into smaller, self-reliant services that can be developed and deployed independently.



**Q:** **Who are some peopel or companies known for their expertise in avoiding code rewrite disasters?**





**A:** While specific names might be hard to pinpoint due to the often-confidential nature of thes projects, companies known for their strong engineering practices and iterative development methodologies are less likely to succumb to the allure of a complete rewrite. Look into companies with a reputation for building stable, long-lived software systems.

Leave a Replay