German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock described the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon as a “ray of hope” for the entire region.
The German newspaper “Spiegel” reported, citing Baerbock, that this truce represents “a success for diplomacy and what can be achieved through it.”
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau expressed his country’s welcome of reaching a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, calling on all parties to implement it fully.
The Canadian Prime Ministry published Trudeau saying: “Canada welcomes the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which entered into force at 4:00 a.m. Jerusalem time.”
He stressed the necessity of this step to ensure stability and security in the region, thanking the United States and France for their efforts in achieving the agreement.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon would provide a measure of relief to civilians.
He added that immediate progress must be seen towards reaching a ceasefire in Gaza, releasing all hostages, and lifting restrictions on humanitarian access to the Strip.
For his part, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy affirmed Britain’s support for the role of UNIFIL forces in maintaining peace on the Blue Line between Israel and Lebanon, while strengthening cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces, and urged adherence to the ceasefire to pave the way for lasting peace.
- United Nations..
In an official statement, the United Nations Special Coordinator in Lebanon, Jeanine Plasschaert, welcomed the agreement, considering that ensuring the sustainability of its implementation in the long term requires “a lot of work.”
She said, “This detailed agreement represents the starting point for a decisive process aimed at ensuring the safety of civilians on both sides of the Blue Line.”
- European Union..
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the agreement and described it as “very encouraging news” that will strengthen internal security and stability in Lebanon thanks to restricting the influence of Lebanese factions.
She stressed that the agreement is welcomed “primarily for the Lebanese and Israeli peoples affected by the fighting.”
Iran welcomed the cessation of the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, and Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei said that Tehran “welcomes the news of the end of the Zionist entity’s aggression against Lebanon,” stressing the continued “firm Iranian support for the Lebanese government, people and resistance.”
Egypt expressed its welcome for the ceasefire to enter into force in a step that would contribute to the start of a phase of de-escalation in the region.
The Egyptian Foreign Ministry explained that this will only be achieved through the full implementation of Security Council Resolution No. 1701 with all its elements, and enabling the Lebanese army to deploy in southern Lebanon and extend its control over the entire Lebanese territory.
The Foreign Ministry stressed that the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon should be a prelude to stopping the Israeli war on Gaza
The Turkish Foreign Ministry welcomed the positive outcome of the ceasefire negotiations in Lebanon, hoping that this ceasefire will be permanent.
She added: “The international community should put pressure on Israel to literally adhere to the ceasefire and compensate for the damage it caused to Lebanon.”
Announcing the agreement between Lebanon and Israel..
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Tuesday evening the mini-ministerial council’s approval of a ceasefire agreement between Tel Aviv and Lebanon.
This was followed by US President Joe Biden announcing that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to a ceasefire in what is the bloodiest conflict between the two sides.
The ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel entered into force at four o’clock in the morning on Wednesday, more than a year after skirmishes turned into Israeli aggression and intense fighting.
Source: Novosti + RT
#Arab #international #ceasefire #agreement #Israel #Lebanon
What are the main challenges to achieving lasting peace between Israel and Lebanon despite the ceasefire?
## Interview about the Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire
**Interviewer:** We’re here today to discuss the recent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon. International reaction has been largely positive, with many world leaders expressing hope for lasting peace. Joining us today is [Guest name], an expert on Middle Eastern geopolitical affairs.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** The ceasefire, brokered by the US and France, went into effect early Wednesday morning. What’s your take on the agreement?
**Guest:** This ceasefire is indeed a welcome development. The conflict had been causing immense suffering to civilians on both sides.
**Interviewer:** Many leaders have been quick to praise the agreement. We heard from German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock who called it a “ray of hope” for the region [[1](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/27/world/middleeast/israel-lebanon-military-ceasefire.html)]. What’s your take on the international community’s reaction?
**Guest:** It’s clear that the international community is relieved to see violence de-escalate. This agreement provides a much-needed opportunity to build trust and work towards a more durable solution. We’ve seen encouraging statements from countries like Canada and the United Kingdom [[Information from text provided]]. Hopefully, this momentum can translate into concrete action.
**Interviewer:** What are some of the challenges to achieving lasting peace?
**Guest:** There are still significant challenges ahead. Ensuring full implementation of the ceasefire, addressing the root causes of the conflict, and building trust between both sides will require sustained effort and commitment from all parties involved. The United Nations Special Coordinator in Lebanon, Jeanine Plasschaert, rightly pointed out the need for long-term work to ensure sustainability [[Information from text provided]].
**Interviewer:** Some voices, like the Iranian Foreign Ministry, have focused on the end of “Israeli aggression” [[Information from text provided]]. How might these differing perspectives impact future negotiations?
**Guest:** Diverse viewpoints are inevitable in such complex situations. It’s important for all parties to engage in constructive dialog, focusing on common goals – peace, security, and the well-being of all those affected by the conflict.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing your insights with us today.
**Guest:** It was my pleasure.
