The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI filed bails in Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and in Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park burning of police vehicles. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life to protect the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What legal strategies might Mr. Khan’s defense team employ moving forward, given the court’s rejection of his bail applications?
## Interview with Legal Expert on Imran Khan’s Bail Rejection
**Host:** Joining me today is Alex Reed, a legal expert specializing in Pakistani law. Mr./Ms. Alex Reed, thank you for coming in.
**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** We’re here to discuss the recent decision by Lahore’s Anti-Terrorism Court to reject bail for former Prime Minister Imran Khan in eight cases related to the May 9th riots. Can you give us a brief overview of the court’s decision and the key arguments presented by Mr. Khan’s legal team?
**Alex Reed:** Absolutely. On May 9th, following Mr. Khan’s arrest, there were widespread protests and unrest across Pakistan. The court is examining eight cases against Mr. Khan stemming from these events, including the attack on Jinnah House and arson at various locations. Judge Manzar Ali Gul rejected Mr. Khan’s bail applications after hearing arguments from both the prosecution and defense. Mr. Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued that the public’s reaction was a result of Mr. Khan’s unpopular views and that numerous cases have been filed against him without merit. He highlighted previous instances where Mr. Khan has received relief from lower courts and emphasized that his client has been incarcerated for a considerable period already. [[1](https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/pakistan-court-rejects-imran-khans-bail-in-eight-cases-related-to-may-9-riots/articleshow/115741075.cms)]
**Host:** What are the implications of this ruling for Mr. Khan’s legal standing and political future?
**Alex Reed:** This is a significant setback for Mr. Khan. It means he will remain in custody while these cases proceed. The rejection of bail suggests the seriousness with which the court views these charges. Its impact on his political future remains to be seen. His party, PTI, has already faced a government crackdown and public protests demanding his release.
**Host:** How do you view the arguments presented by Mr. Khan’s lawyer, particularly regarding the numerous cases filed against him?
**Alex Reed:** Barrister Safdar’s strategy highlights a consistent theme in Mr. Khan’s legal battles – the overwhelming number of cases against him. His team often contends that this is a politically motivated strategy to silence him.
The court will ultimately have to weigh the evidence presented by both sides and determine the validity of these claims.
**Host:** Thank you, Mr./Ms. Alex Reed, for sharing your insights into this complex legal case.
**Alex Reed:** You’re welcome.
