The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
How can judges maintain their impartiality in the face of increasing scrutiny from the press and political entities?
**Interview with Legal Analyst Maria Rossi on Recent Tensions Between Judges and the Press**
**Interviewer (Dario Martini):** Maria, thank you for joining us today. There’s been quite a stir recently regarding the interactions between magistrates and political figures in Italy, particularly surrounding the comments made by Judge Antonella Marrone about Giorgia Meloni. What can you tell us about the implications of these statements?
**Maria Rossi:** Thank you, Dario. The situation reflects a growing concern among magistrates about public scrutiny and criticism from the press. Judge Marrone’s comments on Meloni’s post indicate a personal view that blends sentiment with her professional stance, raising questions about the impartiality expected from judges. Such remarks can lead to public mistrust in the judicial system, especially in politically charged contexts.
**Interviewer:** The reaction among magistrates seems to suggest a defensive posture. Why do you think they’re feeling the need to increase the “level of guard”?
**Maria Rossi:** The sense of urgency stems from a fear that their opinions—especially those expressed in private chats or personal platforms—could be misconstrued or misused against them. This has become particularly sensitive since the media has picked up on these comments, prompting magistrates to worry about potential repercussions on their credibility and independence. They may feel that their professional integrity is under threat from political figures and their supporters who might use these public narratives against the judiciary.
**Interviewer:** We’ve also seen comparisons made between Giorgia Meloni and Silvio Berlusconi in terms of their political strategies and influence. Can you elaborate on this?
**Maria Rossi:** Yes, Deputy Prosecutor Marco Patarnello’s statement, suggesting Meloni might be more dangerous than Berlusconi due to the lack of ongoing investigations against her, highlights the shifting landscape of Italian politics. While Berlusconi was often embroiled in legal controversies, Meloni’s current political strength appears less challenged by judicial scrutiny. This difference raises concerns among some judicial figures, and those apprehensions are voiced more openly now, especially through platforms like the ANM mailing list.
**Interviewer:** With the pressures mounting, what do you think should be the priority for the judiciary in Italy moving forward?
**Maria Rossi:** The priority should be to uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary while addressing the communication gap with the public. It’s essential for judges to maintain a level of professional distance from political discourse to retain public confidence. Additionally, there needs to be a dialog on protecting judicial figures from undue pressure or backlash resulting from their personal beliefs, ensuring that their primary focus remains on justice and legal proceedings rather than political conflicts.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Maria, for your insights on this complex issue. It seems the road ahead will require careful navigation.
**Maria Rossi:** Absolutely, Dario. The intersection of law and politics is fraught with challenges, and it’s crucial that both sides approach it with responsibility and respect for the rule of law.