ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How might Trump’s attempts to distance himself from labels like “Nazi” impact voter perception as the election approaches?
**Interview with Political Analyst: Understanding the Trump-Harris Exchange**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We are delving into the heated exchange between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the upcoming presidential elections. To start, what are your thoughts on Trump’s response to Harris’s comments regarding his alleged admiration for authoritarian figures?
**Political Analyst:** Thanks for having me. Trump’s denial of being a Nazi and his assertion of being “the opposite of a Nazi” is an attempt to distance himself from the extreme labels being thrown around. Given the political climate, he likely feels compelled to counter such accusations directly, especially with the stakes so high in this election.
**Interviewer:** Kamala Harris has described Trump as a danger to democracy, emphasizing that he wants “power without control.” How significant is this framing in the lead-up to the elections?
**Political Analyst:** It’s crucial. By framing Trump as unstable and a threat, Harris is tapping into broader concerns about democracy and governance. Her language suggests that Trump poses a risk not just personally but to the fabric of American politics as a whole. This is an effective strategy to rally voters who may be uncertain about their choices this election.
**Interviewer:** In the current political landscape, personal attacks have become more frequent. How do you see this affecting the average voter’s perception?
**Political Analyst:** Personal attacks can alienate some voters, but they can also energize a base by creating a clear distinction between candidates. For many, the choice might boil down to which candidate they believe will safeguard democratic values. The polarization we are witnessing could lead to heightened turnout as voters feel compelled to act against the candidate they view as more dangerous.
**Interviewer:** With elections approaching swiftly and tension rising, what should we expect in terms of electoral strategies from both sides?
**Political Analyst:** Expect more targeted messaging that emphasizes the stakes of this election. Trump is likely to appeal to his base by reinforcing his outsider status and framing the election as a battle against a corrupt establishment. Meanwhile, Harris and the Democrats will continue to leverage fears about Trump’s potential return to power, painting it as a risk to societal norms and democratic principles.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It’s clear that the rhetoric will only intensify as we approach Election Day.
**Political Analyst:** Absolutely. It will be interesting to see how voters respond to this fierce exchange of words and the strategies that both parties employ in these final days.
