India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of BCCI: Captaincy controversy; The chief selector rejected Kohli and backed Ganguly”>cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When he was asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to behave like South Africa during the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do. Instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How do you foresee the future of player inclusivity in leagues like the IPL, considering the current political climate and historical context of sports interactions between India and Pakistan?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Roy. Let’s begin with your recent comments regarding Pakistan’s role in international cricket. You stated that your call to isolate Pakistan was primarily influenced by public opinion. Can you elaborate on how much this influenced your decision?
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. Yes, public sentiment plays a significant role in any public office, including cricket administration. After incidents like the Pulwama attack, there was a vehement demand from fans and various media outlets for strong actions against Pakistan. My statements were meant to address the prevailing mood, even though personally, I do not support isolating Pakistan.
**Interviewer:** You referenced the apartheid analogy as a benchmark for Pakistan’s behaviour. Do you believe such comparisons could undermine the principles of sportsmanship and the Olympic Charter, which advocates for sports as a human right?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s a crucial point. While the comparison was made to invoke a sense of accountability, I recognize that it can be controversial. My intention was never to promote exclusion but to highlight the seriousness of the situation. However, I agree that sports should ideally bring people together, not divide them.
**Interviewer:** During the recent World Cup, India played against Pakistan despite your previous statements. Was there any internal dissent regarding this match, particularly given the strong public opinion favoring isolation?
**Vinod Roy:** Absolutely, there were discussions. Many believed that we should refuse to play. However, I had to consider the consequences—losing points in a critical tournament is not a viable strategy. Ultimately, I prioritized the team’s progress and decided against withdrawing from the match.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that Pakistani players are not allowed to participate in the IPL. Do you foresee any possibility of integration moving forward, or will such decisions continue to be influenced primarily by political climates?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s a challenging question. As of now, the current atmosphere doesn’t favor Pakistani players in IPL. However, I believe that cricket, like any sport, must evolve. If conditions improve politically, I would advocate for inclusivity and matches at neutral venues, fostering a spirit of competition rather than isolation.
**Interviewer:** with your statements and actions drawing mixed reactions, what is your hope for the future of Indo-Pak cricket relations?
**Vinod Roy:** My hope is for a scenario where cricket can be a bridge for peace rather than a tool for division. As administrators, we must navigate these complex waters carefully. The essence of the game is competition, and ideally, it should thrive free from political constraints.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy. Your insights shed light on the intricate balance of sports, politics, and public perception.
**Debate Question for Readers:** Considering Vinod Roy’s assertions about public opinion and the complex dynamics between politics and sports, do you believe that cricket should remain apolitical, or are politicians justified in influencing sporting decisions for wider national sentiments? Share your thoughts!