In a rapidly changing environment, cohesion policy remains the key European policy tool for promoting a balanced and sustainable development in the European regions.
The main issue, according to the General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF, Dimitris Skalkos, as he pointed out at the RGC Regional Conference, organized by the “Peloponnisos” newspaper from March 16 to 18, is to clarify the role of the cohesion policy, that is, we want it to address crises or implement long-term strategies.
For his part, the representative of the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) Giorgos Petrakos, we must define the priorities for the planning period after 2027, while to the question of where new resources will be drawn, he answered:
“Europe needs a ‘tax hand’ on large companies that generate huge values and are not taxed”. The following speakers also took part in the discussion: pr. General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF, Ministry of Development and Investments Giorgos Giannoussis,), Economist and Professor, Department of Public Investments, University of Thessaly Alekos Kritikos. The coordinator was Ioannis Papageorgiou, Director General, Regional Policy Observatory.
Athanasios Katsis, Chancellor of the University of Peloponnese
#RGC #Cohesion #Policy #Future
**What are the key challenges currently facing the cohesion policy in Europe according to Dimitris Skalkos?**
**Interview with Dimitris Skalkos, General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us, Mr. Skalkos. At the recent RGC Regional Conference, you emphasized the need to clarify the role of cohesion policy. Why do you believe this clarification is so crucial in today’s rapidly changing environment?
**Dimitris Skalkos**: Thank you for having me. Cohesion policy is essential as it helps maintain balance and sustainable development across Europe’s regions. In a world facing numerous crises—from economic disruptions to environmental challenges—it’s vital that we specify whether our focus should be on immediate crisis response or long-term strategic planning. This clarity will guide how we allocate resources effectively.
**Interviewer**: That’s an important distinction. During the conference, Giorgos Petrakos mentioned potential new resources for the future, specifically advocating for a “tax hand” on large corporations. How do you see this approach influencing the priorities of cohesion policy moving forward?
**Dimitris Skalkos**: Petrakos’s call for a new taxation framework highlights a growing concern that large companies benefiting from the EU’s market need to contribute fairly. If we can redirect these funds towards cohesion initiatives, it could significantly boost our capacity to tackle regional disparities and fund sustainable projects.
**Interviewer**: With the planning period after 2027 approaching, what steps do you believe need to be taken now to prepare for this transition?
**Dimitris Skalkos**: We must begin discussions on our strategic priorities and engage a wide array of stakeholders—from local communities to industry leaders—to ensure that our approach to cohesion policy is comprehensive and forward-thinking. This inclusivity is vital for developing a resilient framework that addresses both current and future challenges.
**Interviewer**: we’ve seen various discussions emerge around the future of cohesion policy, particularly concerning its efficacy in crisis management versus long-term strategies. Given this context, how do you think public opinion should play a role in shaping these policies?
**Dimitris Skalkos**: Public opinion is crucial. It reflects the values and needs of citizens. Engaging the public in dialog not only builds trust but also ensures that policies are responsive to real societal challenges. I encourage individuals to think critically about these issues—how do they see the balance between immediate crisis response and sustainable long-term development?
**Interviewer**: Thank you, Mr. Skalkos, for your insights. Readers, what do you think about the future of cohesion policy? Should it prioritize immediate crises, or should it focus on laying down groundwork for long-term development? Let’s hear your thoughts!
