India‘s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When he was asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to behave like South Africa during the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do. Instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
**Questions:**
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Mr. Roy. Recently, you made headlines with your comments about isolating Pakistan in cricket. Can you clarify what prompted that statement?
**Vinod Roy:** Certainly. The statement was largely a reflection of public sentiment following the Pulwama incident. There was significant pressure from the media and the public to take a strong stance against competing with Pakistan, which I felt compelled to address as the head of the BCCI.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that you don’t actually support isolating Pakistan. How do you reconcile that position with your public statements?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s essential to understand the context. While I personally do not wish to isolate Pakistan, the prevailing view at the time was that any match against them would be controversial. I chose to make a statement to ease this tension and seemed to align with public opinion, rather than lose points in crucial matches like the World Cup.
**Interviewer:** You stated that you were mindful of maintaining the competitive aspect of cricket. Could you elaborate on why you think playing against Pakistan is essential for the sport, despite the political climate?
**Vinod Roy:** Cricket is a unifying sport that transcends borders. While geopolitical issues do affect how teams interact, I believe competitions should ideally continue on neutral grounds. It promotes goodwill and camaraderie, which are core values of sportsmanship.
**Interviewer:** There’s been much discussion around your comparison of Pakistan’s situation to South Africa during apartheid. Do you think such comparisons serve a constructive or divisive purpose in the cricketing community?
**Vinod Roy:** Comparisons are always tricky. They can provoke strong reactions. My intention was not to incite division but to highlight the seriousness of the situation. However, I recognize that such statements might be seen as controversial, and moving forward, I wish to dialogue rather than draw direct parallels that can lead to misunderstanding.
**Interviewer:** Given the mixed reactions to your comments, how do you see the future of India-Pakistan cricket relations? Is there a potential for change?
**Vinod Roy:** I remain hopeful. While the atmosphere is currently tense, sports can act as a bridge. A change in perception from both sides could allow us to foster healthier cricketing relationships, ideally through matches at neutral venues where we can celebrate the game rather than the politics surrounding it.
**Interviewer:** as our readers ponder your statements, do you think fans should separate their love for the game from political narratives, or is it inevitable that these issues will intertwine?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s a pivotal question. Ideally, sports should be a realm free from political discourse. Yet, reality tells us otherwise. Fans often find national identity deeply intertwined with sports. I encourage a perspective where cricket is seen as a means of peace and unity, even amidst political tensions. It’s a complex relationship, but one worth navigating thoughtfully.
—
**Debate Question for Readers:** Given Vinod Roy’s insights on the intersection of cricket and politics, how can cricket fans contribute to fostering a spirit of unity in the sport while acknowledging the ongoing political issues between India and Pakistan? Is sportsmanship purely about the game, or is it deeply affected by the political climate?