The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
How do the tensions between political figures and the judiciary in Italy compare to similar situations in other countries, such as the United States?
**Interview with Legal Analyst Dr. Anna Rossi on Recent Judicial Controversies in Italy**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Rossi. There has been significant turmoil in the Italian judiciary recently, particularly regarding comments made by magistrates about Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Can you explain the context of these comments and the reactions that followed?
**Dr. Rossi:** Thank you for having me. The situation stems from a recent revelation in Italian media concerning Antonella Marrone, a judge known for her decisions regarding the detention of migrants. In a WhatsApp status post dating back to September 2022, she critiqued Meloni’s public persona, suggesting that her anger and ambition were more evident than her parental affection. This post resurfaced and led to a considerable outcry among the judiciary, with some magistrates demanding action against what they perceive as undue scrutiny of their opinions.
**Interviewer:** It appears that some judges are particularly sensitive to media coverage of their personal views. Why do you think there is such a strong reaction within the judiciary?
**Dr. Rossi:** The judiciary is a vital pillar of democratic governance, and judges often feel it is essential to maintain public confidence in their impartiality. When personal opinions are aired, especially in a politically charged environment, it can lead to questions about their objectivity and independence. The reaction is fueled by the belief that the press should not pry into judges’ private thoughts or past statements, particularly when they are seen as politically charged.
**Interviewer:** Would you say that this phenomenon is unique to Italy, or do similar tensions exist in other judicial systems globally?
**Dr. Rossi:** This is certainly not unique to Italy. Many countries experience tensions between political figures and the judiciary, especially when judges become vocal about their opinions. In places like the United States, for example, judicial independence is frequently debated, particularly when judges make rulings that are perceived to have political implications. The balance between personal expression and professional responsibility is a contentious issue everywhere.
**Interviewer:** Recently, there was a separate incident involving Deputy Prosecutor Marco Patarnello, who stated that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi. What does this say about the internal dynamics within the judiciary?
**Dr. Rossi:** It underscores a division within the judiciary, particularly among different factions of magistrates. Patarnello’s statement reflects a broader sense of fear and concern about the political trajectory of Italy under Meloni’s leadership. His comments, however, faced criticism and even a backlash from various quarters, including members of the left. This highlights how polarized the political climate has become and how it seeps into judicial discourse.
**Interviewer:** what implications do you foresee for the Italian judiciary stemming from these events?
**Dr. Rossi:** The ongoing scrutiny could lead to increased calls for judicial reform or changes in how judges communicate with the public. If judges perceive they are under undue pressure from the media or political leaders, it might deter them from expressing their views altogether. However, it could also provoke a stronger push for transparency in judicial matters. Ultimately, how the judiciary navigates this complexity will be crucial in maintaining public trust while ensuring the rule of law is upheld.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Rossi, for providing such valuable insights into these complex issues surrounding the judiciary in Italy.
**Dr. Rossi:** Thank you for having me; it’s an important conversation.