ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
What are the potential consequences of personal attacks between candidates on voter sentiment in the current election cycle?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump’s Response to Harris’ Accusations**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We just saw Donald Trump strongly deny accusations made by Kamala Harris, where she suggested he admires Hitler and poses a danger to democracy. What do you make of his response?
**Analyst:** It’s certainly an intense moment in the campaign. Trump’s declaration, “I am not a Nazi; I am the opposite of a Nazi,” is a direct rebuttal aimed at not only Harris but also at the broader narrative that paints him as a fascist. By firmly rejecting that label, he appeals to his base who are sensitive to such accusations.
**Interviewer:** How significant is it that these personal attacks have become commonplace in this election cycle compared to previous ones?
**Analyst:** The escalation of personal attacks reflects the polarized political climate in the U.S. right now. This election cycle is markedly different from 2016 or 2020 as both sides seem to be leveraging fear and outrage. Harris’s comments about Trump’s admiration for Hitler’s generals, for instance, are designed to resonate emotionally with voters who prioritize democratic values.
**Interviewer:** Trump mentioned that there is “a lot at stake” in this election, suggesting a heightened urgency. Do you think that this message is resonating with the electorate?
**Analyst:** Absolutely, and it’s crucial to his strategy. By emphasizing the stakes, Trump hopes to galvanize support among those who may feel uncertain or fearful of a potential Harris administration. He’s framing the election as a decisive moment in American history which can either preserve or threaten the current state of affairs.
**Interviewer:** What are the implications of Trump suggesting that he could pursue power “without control”?
**Analyst:** That’s particularly alarming, as it brings to light concerns over checks and balances. By stating there will be “no one there to stop it,” it raises questions about his respect for democratic institutions. This could sway undecided voters who are wary of authoritarianism, especially given the backdrop of recent Supreme Court dynamics that he referenced.
**Interviewer:** what should we watch for moving forward in this election?
**Analyst:** Keep an eye on how both candidates will continue to frame their narratives. The back-and-forth on accusations of authoritarianism will likely intensify, and voter turnout will be pivotal. The next few days will be critical as both parties rally their bases and attempt to sway independent voters amid such high stakes.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It’s a pivotal time in this election, and we look forward to your analysis as events unfold.
