India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do. Instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How do you believe public sentiment should influence the decision-making process of sports administrators, particularly in politically sensitive contexts like cricketing relations with Pakistan?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Roy. Your recent comments about isolating Pakistan in cricket have raised quite a few eyebrows. Can you elaborate on the rationale behind those statements?
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. I want to clarify that I made those statements not out of personal belief, but rather in response to public sentiment. After incidents like the Pulwama attack, there was immense pressure from fans and media to adopt a firmer stance against Pakistan in cricket. I felt I had to articulate a position that reflected that outcry.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned the comparison of Pakistan’s status to South Africa during the apartheid era. Some critics argue that such sentiments contradict the Olympic Charter, which promotes sports as a human right. What are your thoughts on that?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s a complex issue. My intention was to express the frustration of many Indians about playing against a nation that we feel has not behaved fairly in various circumstances. However, I acknowledge that framing sports this way can indeed be problematic. My focus wasn’t to evade the Olympic principles but to reflect the prevailing sentiment at the time.
**Interviewer:** You noted that not playing against Pakistan could lead to a loss of points in tournaments. Given the financial implications and the pressure to prioritize revenue, do you think the BCCI’s approach will always leave room for political considerations in sports?
**Vinod Roy:** Revenue is undeniably a factor in sports today. However, it cannot be the sole consideration. We must balance financial outcomes with ethical implications. That’s why while my statement was misinterpreted as a call for complete isolation, I also emphasized that we can engage with teams at neutral venues. It’s about finding a pragmatic approach that respects both sporting integrity and public sentiment.
**Interviewer:** With the ongoing geopolitical tensions, do you foresee a time when India and Pakistan can play cricket without the shadow of political issues?
**Vinod Roy:** I believe in the healing power of sports. While the current situation is fraught with challenges, cricket has the potential to act as a bridge rather than a barrier. It requires goodwill from both sides, and while it’s tough now, I remain hopeful that there will be a time in the future when we can compete without political overtones.
**Interviewer:** how do you think the general public should view this situation? Do you think there is a possibility for a debate on this topic among fans?
**Vinod Roy:** Absolutely, public opinion is crucial in shaping cricketing policies. I encourage fans to engage in discussions that consider both the emotional and ethical aspects of the game. It’s important for them to reflect on whether isolating a team is indeed beneficial to the spirit of sports. I’d love to hear varying perspectives; it’s what makes cricket not just a game but a significant cultural phenomenon.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy, for sharing your insights today.
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. It’s vital that we keep these conversations going.
—
What are your thoughts on the implications of Vinod Roy’s statements? Should public sentiment steer sports policies, or should ethics prevail regardless of popular opinion? Let’s discuss!
