The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
What impact do Judge Antonella Marrone’s comments about Giorgia Meloni have on the perception of judicial impartiality in Italy?
**Interview with Antonella Marrone, Judge at the Rome Tribunal**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Judge Marrone. There’s been quite a stir following your recent comments about Giorgia Meloni on social media. Can you explain the context behind your remarks?
**Marrone:** Thank you for having me. My comment was intended as a personal reflection on a public figure’s expression. I used the opportunity to critically assess the emotions that can drive political leaders, particularly when they present themselves publicly.
**Interviewer:** There seems to be a strong response from some colleagues within the judiciary regarding your post. Why do you think they feel it necessary to raise the level of guard?
**Marrone:** The judiciary operates based on principles of independence and impartiality, and any perceived bias can lead to concerns about our credibility. However, I believe that public accountability and discourse are crucial, and I stand by the belief that judges should be able to express their thoughts without fear of backlash.
**Interviewer:** Recently, Deputy Prosecutor Marco Patarnello referred to Meloni as “more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi.” What are your thoughts on the implications of these statements, especially concerning freedom of the press?
**Marrone:** I think it highlights the delicate balance that must be maintained between expressing opinions and allowing free speech, especially in a judicial context. While I can understand why some judges may feel threatened, it is essential that we allow for open dialog, including criticism of political figures.
**Interviewer:** You’ve also been involved in some controversial decisions regarding the treatment of migrants. How does this intersect with the criticisms of political figures in your line of work?
**Marrone:** Our decisions are often influenced by legal principles and human rights considerations, rather than political. The backlash I received is more a reflection of the current political climate in Italy than my judicial choices. I believe that our system must prioritize legality and compassion in dealing with migrants.
**Interviewer:** What do you hope for in terms of future interactions between the judiciary and politics, especially under the current government?
**Marrone:** I hope for a respectful and constructive dialog. It’s vital for a functional democracy that the judiciary remains independent while also being engaged with societal issues. It is my hope that political figures can likewise engage with the judiciary in a manner that respects its autonomy.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing your insights, Judge Marrone. This topic is undeniably complex, and it will be interesting to see how these discussions progress.
**Marrone:** Thank you for having me. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these important issues.
