The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas expressed publicly by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
What measures does Judge Marrone believe are necessary for maintaining a healthy dialog between the judiciary and the government, especially amidst growing tensions?
**Interview with Judge Antonella Marrone**
*Dario Martini: Thank you for joining us today, Judge Marrone. Recent events have sparked intense discussions regarding the conduct of judges, particularly your comments about Giorgia Meloni. Can you share your thoughts on the media coverage surrounding your WhatsApp post?*
**Judge Marrone:** Thank you for having me. The media coverage has certainly been sensationalized, and I believe it reflects a larger issue regarding the independence of the judiciary. My comments were made in a personal context and should not be interpreted as an official stance.
*Dario Martini: Critics argue that posts like yours undermine the judiciary’s impartiality. How do you respond to those claims?*
**Judge Marrone:** I understand the concern. However, judges are also citizens with opinions. The key is to ensure that our professional duties remain separate from our personal views. My intention was never to influence public perception or undermine the credibility of the judiciary.
*Dario Martini: There has been a “mole hunt” among judicial circles since your post was shared. How do you feel about the reaction from your colleagues?*
**Judge Marrone:** It’s disheartening to see such hostility within our community. While I respect the differing opinions, I think it’s essential for us to support one another rather than engage in infighting. We must focus on the broader issues affecting our profession.
*Dario Martini: This isn’t the first instance of criticism directed at Giorgia Meloni from members of the judiciary. How do you view the ongoing tensions between the government and the judiciary?*
**Judge Marrone:** The judiciary must remain a check on governmental power, and healthy tension is sometimes necessary for democracy. However, I do think it’s crucial for both branches to engage in dialog rather than conflict.
*Dario Martini: In light of your recent judgments regarding migrants, do you believe the media scrutiny will change the way you approach similar cases in the future?*
**Judge Marrone:** While I strive to remain steadfast in my rulings based on the law and facts, I also recognize the importance of public perception. Nevertheless, my primary responsibility is to uphold justice, and that will always be my guiding principle.
*Dario Martini: Thank you, Judge Marrone, for your insights. It seems this issue will continue to unfold, and we appreciate your willingness to engage with it openly.*
