2024-11-24 00:18:00
The climate negotiations in Baku ended with an absolute minimum compromise and a half-hearted climate financing target. By 2035, 300 billion US dollars should be made available annually for global climate protection, climate adaptation and climate-related damage and losses. This is far below the actual needs of developing countries. There is a faint glimmer of hope: by the next climate conference in Brazil, a roadmap should be developed on how this financing gap can be closed. Greenpeace is primarily calling for those responsible for the climate crisis – the fossil fuel industry – to be taxed accordingly and to use the income for climate financing. Greenpeace also criticizes the fact that, after Baku, there is still no obligation to anchor the already decided phase-out of fossil fuels in the climate protection plans due for all countries in 2025.
Jasmin Duregger, climate and energy expert at Greenpeace in Austria and on site in Baku: “The world has missed the chance to finally open the money taps necessary to confront the climate crisis worldwide. This is a bitter disappointment for everyone whose livelihoods and homes are already being destroyed by the climate crisis. A glimmer of hope is the agreement to develop a roadmap for increasing financial resources by the next climate summit in Brazil. Ways must be found there to make the real perpetrators of the climate crisis – the fossil fuel industry – pay.”
There is also hardly any improvement in the move away from fossil fuels: “The climate summit did not achieve the hoped-for progress in climate protection. It is now up to the individual states to show leadership and promote the phase-out of coal, oil and gas in their countries. Climate protection must play a central role in the Austrian government negotiations; this is the only way Austria can remain an ally in the fight against the climate crisis.”
All hope now lies in the climate negotiations in Belem, Brazil next year. Everything there will revolve around increasing the climate protection goals for the 10th anniversary of the Paris climate goals. Duregger on this: “We can now only look forward to the next climate negotiations in Brazil with hope. The expectations are clear: In Brazil it is finally time for a presidency that shows more diplomatic skills and can thus build bridges between the countries. After the disappointing result in Baku, a lot has to be made up for next year.”
OTS ORIGINAL TEXT PRESS RELEASE UNDER THE EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SENDER FOR CONTENT – WWW.OTS.AT | GRP
1732414774
#Greenpeace #criticizes #climate #summit #disappointing #minimal #compromise
What were the main outcomes of the recent climate negotiations at COP29 in Baku, and how do they affect developing countries?
**Interview with Jasmin Duregger, Climate and Energy Expert at Greenpeace Austria**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Jasmin. The recent climate negotiations in Baku have concluded with what many are calling a minimal compromise. Can you summarize the outcomes for our audience?
**Jasmin Duregger:** Thank you for having me. Yes, the negotiations resulted in a commitment to provide 300 billion US dollars annually for climate protection until 2035. However, this figure is greatly insufficient considering the urgent needs of developing countries facing climate impacts. We are still a long way from the amount required to effectively address climate adaptation and damage from climate-related disasters.
**Interviewer:** That sounds concerning. You mentioned a glimmer of hope regarding future conferences. What can we expect in the lead-up to the next climate conference in Brazil?
**Jasmin Duregger:** There is an expectation that a roadmap will be developed to close the significant financing gap. This is vital, as many nations are struggling to meet their immediate climate-related needs. However, the specifics of this roadmap are still unclear, and time is of the essence.
**Interviewer:** Greenpeace has been vocal about the role of the fossil fuel industry in the climate crisis. What specific actions are you advocating for from this sector?
**Jasmin Duregger:** We are calling for the fossil fuel industry to be taxed appropriately for their contribution to the climate crisis, with the revenue generated being allocated directly to climate financing. It’s critical that those who have historically benefited from fossil fuels contribute to the solutions needed to mitigate climate change impacts.
**Interviewer:** What are your thoughts on the lack of obligation to incorporate the phase-out of fossil fuels in climate protection plans due by 2025?
**Jasmin Duregger:** This is a significant oversight. Without a firm mandate to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, we risk undermining any progress made. The absence of binding commitments in this area highlights the challenges in achieving meaningful climate action and reinforces the need for stronger accountability measures.
**Interviewer:** Looking ahead, what can our listeners do to support climate action in light of these negotiations?
**Jasmin Duregger:** I encourage everyone to stay informed and advocate for ambitious climate policies. Supporting organizations that work towards climate justice, holding governments accountable, and pushing for the taxation of polluters can make a difference. Collective action is vital to ensure our leaders take the necessary steps to secure a sustainable future.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Jasmin, for your insights and for your efforts in advocating for our planet’s future.
**Jasmin Duregger:** Thank you for having me. Let’s continue the conversation for change!
