The mole hunt has begun among the red robes. The scoop from , which yesterday published the anti-Meloni post by Antonella Marrone, the AreaDg judge, drove the members of this left-wing current crazy. Marrone is the Rome magistrate who signed some of the measures suspending the detention of migrants in Albania, with the consequence that this morning they had already returned to Italy. In the chats and messages between the magistrates, a real tom tam has started to ask to raise the level of guard, since it is considered unacceptable that the press dares to delve into the (recent) past and into the ideas publicly expressed by the judges. We need to remember what Marrone wrote on 12 September 2022, shortly before the political elections. He had taken a screenshot of a post by Giorgia Meloni with which the future prime minister wished her daughter a happy first day at school. This photo was published on his WhatsApp “status”, with the following comment: «Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that drives it? Hearing her speak in that angry voice seemed the opposite to me. I must have been wrong.”
It is the second time that the red robes protest against . It also happened last October 20, when the deputy prosecutor of Cassation Marco Patarnello of the Democratic Magistracy wrote in an ANM mailing list that Meloni is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi because she has no investigations. Immediately afterwards he received the support of the left, with Avs senator Ilaria Cucchi suing to find out the source of this news, in spite of freedom of the press. Incidentally, Patarnello’s movement celebrated its sixtieth anniversary in the Capitol last Saturday and Sunday. On that occasion, judge Silvia Albano, who was the first to “free” 12 migrants in Albania in mid-October, on the eve of Marrone’s sentence, anticipated the orientation of the Court of Rome on the need to get illegal immigrants out of the CPR in based on the interpretation of a ruling of the European Court of Justice.
The magistrate then added that “nothing can be done about the supremacy of European law, it is the government that seeks conflict”. A preview that provoked the reaction of Forza Italia group leader Maurizio Gasparri in the Senate, who asked the Keeper of the Seals Carlo Nordio to send inspectors to the immigration section of the Court of Rome. The line of these judges from the DG Area and Democratic Magistracy is fully supported by the president of the ANM Giuseppe Santalucia, according to whom “the situation has even worsened” compared to the times of Silvio Berlusconi, because previously the “red robes” were the public prosecutors , while now the red robes are everywhere, even in the civil courts and anyone who takes an unwelcome measure turns red.” It’s a shame that those red robes then write verbatim that the FdI leader “has a loud angry voice” and is dominated by “ego, envy and ambition”.
#AntiMeloni #judge #mole #hunt #among #red #robes #scoop #Tempo #Tempo
What specific measures does Sofia Rinaldi propose to enhance judicial transparency and protect judges’ rights to express their opinions?
**Interview with Legal Analyst Sofia Rinaldi on Judicial Independence and Media Scrutiny**
**Interviewer (Dario Martini):** Thank you for joining us today, Sofia. Recent events involving Italian magistrate Antonella Marrone have stirred quite a controversy, especially regarding the scrutiny of judges’ personal opinions. What are your thoughts on the situation?
**Sofia Rinaldi:** Thank you for having me, Dario. This situation highlights a significant tension between judicial independence and public accountability. When judges express their opinions, even in private contexts like WhatsApp, it raises questions about their impartiality. However, it’s crucial to balance this with the rights of public servants to express themselves in a democratic society.
**Interviewer:** Indeed. The recent press reports showcasing Marrone’s comments about Giorgia Meloni have intensified the debate. How do you see this affecting the relationship between the judiciary and the media?
**Sofia Rinaldi:** The media plays a vital role in holding public officials accountable, including judges. However, when the judiciary feels threatened by media coverage—particularly when it examines their opinions—it can lead to a chilling effect on free speech. It’s essential that judges remain transparent, but they must also have the freedom to express personal views without fear of immediate backlash.
**Interviewer:** There have been reactions within the judicial community, including calls to raise the level of guard. What implications do you think this has for future judicial proceedings and public trust?
**Sofia Rinaldi:** The calls for increased scrutiny indicate a defensive posture among judges regarding the media. This could erode public trust if the perception becomes that judges are acting out of fear rather than an obligation to uphold the law. On the other hand, if judges are seen as overly defensive or unapproachable, it could further alienate the public they serve.
**Interviewer:** Some members of the judiciary have compared Meloni’s influence to that of Berlusconi. What does this say about the current political climate and its impact on the judiciary?
**Sofia Rinaldi:** This comparison reflects deep-seated concerns among some magistrates about the potential for political interference in the judiciary. The fact that they perceive Meloni as a threat without ongoing investigations against her suggests a fear of diminished judicial autonomy. The politics surrounding judiciary-media interactions are complex and could have lasting implications for how justice is administered in Italy.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, what can be done to navigate these challenges while preserving the integrity of the judicial system?
**Sofia Rinaldi:** It’s essential to foster an environment where judges can express their views without repercussions, while also ensuring that they remain impartial in their professional duties. Establishing clearer guidelines on judges’ social media use and public commentary could help. Moreover, promoting judicial transparency, coupled with robust media literacy for journalists, could bridge the gap and reassure the public about the integrity of the judiciary.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Sofia, for your insights on this pressing issue. It’s clear that the balance between judicial independence and accountability remains a delicate one.
**Sofia Rinaldi:** Thank you, Dario. It’s a vital discussion, and I hope it continues as we navigate these challenges.
