ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**In what ways might personal attacks during this election cycle affect voter sentiment and decision-making?**
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Doe on Trump’s Response to Harris’ Accusations**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Jane. With the upcoming elections just days away, Donald Trump has made a bold statement denying accusations of being “Nazi” or “fascist.” How significant is this response in the context of the current political climate?
**Jane Doe:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s response is significant because it directly addresses what has become a central theme of the campaign: character and stability. With accusations coming from figures like Kamala Harris about his authoritarian tendencies, Trump’s denial is an attempt to reclaim his narrative and connect with voters who are seriously concerned about the implications of his potential presidency.
**Interviewer:** Harris has stated that Trump is “even more unstable and more unhinged.” How are these personal attacks shaping voter perceptions leading up to the elections?
**Jane Doe:** Personal attacks are a common strategy in heated elections, especially when candidates are trying to distinguish themselves. Harris’s comments reflect a broader Democratic strategy to frame Trump as a danger to democracy. This could resonate with undecided voters who may not have a strong allegiance yet. However, for Trump’s base, these attacks might reinforce their loyalty, as they often view him as an outsider fighting against a corrupt system.
**Interviewer:** Trump argues that “there will be no one there to stop it” if he gains power. What does he mean by this, and how could it impact voter turnout?
**Jane Doe:** Trump’s assertion speaks to a concern about accountability and checks on his power, especially given his past claims about being essentially immune from consequences while in office. This could galvanize his supporters, who might believe that an unstopped Trump means he could finally enact policies unopposed. Conversely, it might alarm moderate voters and lead to an increase in turnout for Democrats who feel compelled to act against such a scenario.
**Interviewer:** In light of this political tension, what should voters keep in mind as they head to the polls?
**Jane Doe:** Voters must critically evaluate the candidates’ statements and their implications. They should consider not just the personalities involved but also the potential policies and political ethos each candidate represents. This election is undeniably a high-stakes environment, and every vote could make a significant difference in shaping the future of the country.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Jane, for sharing your insights on this crucial topic.
**Jane Doe:** Thank you for having me; it’s always a pleasure to discuss the dynamics of our political landscape.
