The Lahore High Court ordered the release of Parvez Elahi. Lahore High Court heard the petition filed against the arrest of Parvez Elahi in NAB. Justice Amjad Rafique heard the petition of Pervez Elahi.
During the hearing, Justice Amjad Rafiq said that there will be an inquiry on the arrest of Parvez Elahi, when the decision of the two-member bench was reached, then why was the physical remand extended? Lawyer Pervaiz Elahi requested the court that there is a lot of crowd outside the High Court, there is fear that the police will arrest them.
Justice Amjad Rafiq replied that we have said that we will not arrest in any case, I am also ordering the rest. Pervaiz Elahi had challenged the NAB arrest in the High Court. The court had ordered Parvez Elahi to appear before the court at ten o’clock.
NAB Lahore had written a letter to IG Punjab and others for Parvaizalhi’s security.
Earlier, a hearing was held in the Lahore High Court on the petition filed against the arrest of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervez Elahi by NAB. Justice Amjad Rafiq heard the request of Pervaiz Elahi.
During the hearing, the NAB prosecutor said that time should be given for a detailed response to the request of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi, Justice Amjad Rafique remarked that it is fine, then we order Parvez Elahi to be deported.
The court told the NAB officials that you should apply to the Chief Justice that this application be fixed for hearing before a 2-member bench. Is the arrest of the former Chief Minister of Punjab in accordance with the law?, all the questions are to be answered in your reports.
The NAB prosecutor argued that the single bench did not give a direction not to arrest Parvaiz Elahi.
The Prosecutor General said that it is in the decisions of the Supreme Court that a two-member bench can hear the cases of NAB, a single bench cannot hear the cases of NAB, it is the work of the subordinate courts to implement the decisions of the Supreme Court. Give respite, we will submit a full detailed report to the court.
The NAB prosecutor objected to the appearance of Amjad Parvez on behalf of Parvez Elahi and said that Amjad Parvez does not have a power of attorney in this case.
The court remarked that it seems like this is a personal matter of yours. The NAB prosecutor said that Amjad Parvez himself is the special prosecutor of NAB, how can he appear?
Amjad Pervez said that I represent NAB only in specific cases. Justice Amjad Rafiq said you should start the arguments, the court is giving permission, if you want me not to hear this case, then apply to the Chief Justice.
Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that the arrest of Parvez Elahi is in accordance with the law, when the two-member bench restored the decision of the single bench, then the decision of the single bench is upheld, the law is very clear in this regard, we have to decide now. Parvez Elahi’s arrest is legal or illegal.
Lahore High Court ordered to present former Chief Minister Punjab and PTI leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court at 2 pm, however NAB decided not to present Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court.
It should be noted that Chaudhry Parvez Elahi has requested NAB to declare his arrest as illegal.
#Lahore #High #Court #ordered #release #PTI #President #Pervaiz #Elahi
How might the Lahore High Court’s inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Parvez Elahi’s arrest impact the National Accountability Bureau’s procedures and public perception?
**Interview with Legal Expert on the Lahore High Court’s Ruling Concerning Parvez Elahi**
**Interviewer:** Good evening and welcome. Today, we are joined by [Expert Name], a renowned legal analyst, to discuss the recent developments concerning Chaudhry Parvez Elahi and his court case. Thank you for being with us.
**Expert:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Let’s dive right in. The Lahore High Court recently ordered the release of Parvez Elahi, who was arrested by NAB. Can you explain the court’s rationale behind this decision?
**Expert:** Absolutely. The Lahore High Court, under Justice Amjad Rafique, listened to Parvez Elahi’s petition challenging his arrest. During the hearing, Justice Rafique expressed concerns about the legality of extending Elahi’s physical remand. He indicated that the court would conduct an inquiry into the circumstances of his arrest and questioned why the decision made by the two-member bench wasn’t being respected by the NAB, prompting the court to order Elahi’s release [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** There was mention of a significant crowd outside the court during the hearing, raising concerns about further arrests. How did the court address these concerns?
**Expert:** Yes, the lawyer for Parvez Elahi highlighted the potential for police action given the crowd situation outside the courthouse. In response, Justice Rafique assured that no arrests would be carried out in this matter at that moment, indicating a level of judicial protection for Elahi and his supporters [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** The NAB prosecutor suggested that they needed more time to respond comprehensively. What are the implications of this request for the case going forward?
**Expert:** The NAB prosecutor’s request for additional time signals that the prosecution may not have been fully prepared to justify Elahi’s arrest under NAB regulations or their legal grounds. Justice Rafique’s response to allow for this timeframes yet still order Elahi’s release suggests the court was not convinced by the NAB’s current arguments. This could set a precedent for how similar cases are treated in the future, particularly concerning procedural fairness [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** Given the nature of this case, what might we expect in terms of future legal proceedings or implications for Parvez Elahi?
**Expert:** With the court’s directive for an inquiry into the legality of his arrest, it’s probable that further hearings will take place to scrutinize the NAB’s actions. Additionally, if the court finds that the arrest did not align with legal protocols, it could bolster Elahi’s case and could also have ramifications for NAB’s future conduct. It’s a fluid situation that definitely merits close observation [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, [Expert Name]. This case touches on crucial issues of legal procedures and rights in Pakistan, and your expertise helps clarify its complexities.
**Expert:** Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this important matter.
**Interviewer:** That’s it for today’s discussion. We hope you found this interview informative and engaging as we continue to follow this developing story.