Our collaboration with the Centre for Blood Research (CBR) at the University of British Columbia is cultivating the next generation of experts in transfusion science. This blog post showcases some of the remarkable educational, training, and knowledge mobilization milestones reached by the talented trainees at CBR.
The Canadian Blood Services 2024 Lay Science Writing Competition, in partnership with the Centre for Blood Research (CBR), offers research trainees a unique opportunity to develop and refine their science communication skills by disseminating their groundbreaking research to lay audiences. The competition is accessible to a diverse group of research trainees within the expansive Canadian Blood Services research network—encompassing those funded directly by Canadian Blood Services, those working in laboratories supported by Canadian Blood Services, and those within the esteemed Centre for Blood Research located in Vancouver.
In this blog, postdoctoral fellows Drs. Chaahat Singh and Giorgia Caspani delve into their innovative research conducted in the lab of Dr. Wilfred Jefferies at CBR. They reflect on their enriching experience preparing their written entry for the Lay Science Writing Competition, which impressively secured second prize this year! The full entry is shared below, preceded by a critical editorial note from Canadian Blood Services’ Medical Director of Stem Cells, Dr. Matthew Seftel:
Dr. Chaahat Singh (left) and Dr. Giorgia Caspani (right) are distinguished postdoctoral fellows working in the Vancouver-based lab of Dr. Wilfred Jefferies at CBR.
Why did you choose to participate in the competition this year?
-
Chaahat: A researcher’s ultimate goal is to use their pursuit of knowledge to benefit the community. The importance of sharing new information with those who stand to gain from it cannot be overstated. This competition provided an exceptional platform to share our insights with a broad audience and engage the community in a meaningful dialogue about our work.
-
Giorgia: Engaging with the public and making research accessible is an essential task for scientists. This competition offered an ideal opportunity to showcase the impactful work being done at the Jefferies Lab on a topic of significant public interest, such as iatrogenic diseases that affect many lives.
The theme this year was “Connecting science with society”; what did this theme mean to you?
-
Chaahat: The theme deeply resonates with my core principles as it encapsulates the foundational purpose of our research endeavors. Science is not an isolated venture; it is intended to enhance lives, inform public health strategies, and fuel innovations that serve society. Emphasizing this theme allows us to make complex scientific findings intelligible and relevant to the communities they impact. Our research into the possible transmission of Alzheimer’s disease through stem cell transplantation illuminates the necessity for stringent screening of blood products to avert unintended consequences stemming from medical interventions. By taking part in this competition, I aimed to raise awareness about potential risks within transfusion science, underscoring the urgency of public safety measures.
-
Giorgia: For me, “connecting science with society” signifies the imperative inclusion of the public in the scientific discourse. The ultimate aim of scientific research is to foster positive changes in our communities and enhance individuals’ quality of life. This highlights scientists’ duty to uphold transparency and foster open communication with the non-expert audience.
Did the writing process help you learn or discover something new about your research?
-
Chaahat: Writing for a lay audience compelled me to step back and contemplate the broader societal implications of my research, moving beyond mere technical jargon. This task allowed me to transform complex scientific concepts into more approachable ideas. I recognized that effective science communication is paramount; without public understanding of potential risks or benefits from our research, the overall impact diminishes significantly.
-
Giorgia: Composing the essay prompted me to think critically about the broader implications of our work. The underlying research paper discusses the risk of Alzheimer’s disease transmission through iatrogenic mechanisms, marking the vital importance of thorough screening of biological specimens before transplantation or transfusion is executed to mitigate unintended disease spread.
What ‘next steps’ do you see as important based on your research findings?
-
Chaahat: Our study reveals the potential for iatrogenic transmission of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology via bone marrow transplantation as evidenced in a preclinical model. While this study presents compelling evidence of transplantable AD in animals, it also acknowledges significant limitations arising from the disparities between mouse models and human cases. Future inquiries should probe how these findings might transfer to human scenarios, particularly concerning the neurological risks of various transplantation processes. It is crucial to examine the long-term ramifications of transplantation and transfusion on the human central nervous system, and to scrutinize the likelihood of other diseases being transmitted in such manners. Given the implications of this research, it is imperative to inform recipients about potential dangers, including the rare risk of Alzheimer’s disease transmission during medical procedures. Enhanced informed consent protocols should elucidate that despite rigorous testing and matching processes, risks may persist.
What tips would you share with others who are writing about research for lay audiences?
-
Chaahat: My primary advice is to prioritize clarity and simplicity while retaining the core message of your work. Strive to avoid complex terminology and visualize how you would explain your research to a friend or family member unfamiliar with the science. Utilize relatable analogies and narrative storytelling to engage and captivate readers. Additionally, emphasize the significance and relevance of your research—what issues it addresses and its potential impacts on individuals’ lives. Finally, practice patience and allow for multiple revisions; finding the right equilibrium between technical accuracy and accessibility is vital, but it pays off when your work resonates with a broad audience.
Read the prize-winning entry below…
Unveiling the Hidden Risks of Stem Cell Transplantation
In a charming suburban area, Emily anticipated a transformative procedure that promised to alleviate her life-altering illness. She was about to undergo a stem cell transplant—a glimmer of hope for numerous patients worldwide. Stem cell therapies exhibit remarkable potential, presenting new avenues to treat and heal various conditions. However, contemporary research casts light on the intricate balance between medical innovations and patient safety.
Our latest study, published in Stem Cell Reports, scrutinized the possibility of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) transmission through stem cell transplants in mouse models. This investigation involved the transplantation of donor bone marrow stem cells from mice affected by AD into healthy recipient mice. To our surprise, the implanted stem cells propagated potentially harmful amyloid-beta plaques—characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease—into the recipient mice. As a result, these plaques accumulated in the brains of the rodents, triggering symptoms analogous to Alzheimer’s disease. This research challenges prevailing assumptions that attribute the onset of Alzheimer’s solely to genetic predispositions or aging, exploring the possibility of transmission through medical interventions. Stem cell treatments have been heralded as pioneering approaches for numerous ailments, from Parkinson’s disease to spinal cord injuries. Nevertheless, our research emphasizes the urgent need for robust protocols ensuring patient safety amid these advancements.
For patients like Emily, such findings necessitate thorough screening and careful evaluation of stem cell sources. This outlines the reality that even the most promising medical developments may harbor unexpected risks. The ramifications of this research are profound, as the prospect of disease transmission through medical procedures adds a new layer of complexity to the management of patient safety. Yet, this revelation opens new avenues for scientific investigation and innovation, prompting researchers to develop improved methods for detecting and eliminating harmful substances within stem cell cultures. This evolution can lead to the formulation of safer and more effective therapeutic strategies while significantly enhancing patient care. Additionally, our findings underscore the necessity for continuous diligence and assessment within medical practices, reinforcing the need for stringent regulations and ongoing surveillance of new therapies to prioritize patient safety. By reflecting on these insights, the medical community can better tackle the complexities surrounding novel treatments and mitigate associated risks. Furthermore, this study reveals how scientific advancements can profoundly influence public health perspectives. Breakthroughs in one facet of medicine can reverberate through practices, policies, and overall patient experiences throughout healthcare. As we investigate the potential benefits of stem cell therapies, the ethical implications and safety considerations must be a focal point of discussion.
For Emily and countless others who depend on medical progress, this research serves as a crucial reminder about the importance of informed decision-making and holistic care approaches. It emphasizes that while science promises great advancements, it also necessitates careful management and a persistent commitment to patient welfare.
In conclusion, our discovery concerning the transmission of Alzheimer’s disease through stem cell transplantation in animal models represents a pivotal milestone in medical research. It advocates for sustained attention to safety protocols, stringent testing, and ethical considerations within the continuum of regenerative therapy development. By establishing connections between science and society, we can navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by medical progress, ensuring that innovation and safety remain inseparable.
About the authors:
Dr. Chaahat Singh became a postdoctoral fellow at CBR in January 2021 after completing her PhD in Medical Genetics at the University of British Columbia. Her research interests encompass investigating alternative mechanisms of pathophysiology in Alzheimer’s disease. Currently, she is pursuing the therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs for central nervous system disorders and aims to see preclinical research findings transitioned into clinical applications.
Dr. Giorgia Caspani joined CBR as a postdoctoral fellow in July 2022, following her PhD in neuroscience at Imperial College London. Her current research focuses on the therapeutic capabilities of psychedelic drugs and their interactions with the gut microbiome.
Canadian Blood Services – Driving world-class innovation
Through discovery, development, and applied research, Canadian Blood Services inspires world-renowned innovation in blood transfusion, cellular therapies, and transplantation, bringing clarity and insight to the complex future of healthcare. Our dedicated research team collaborates with an extensive network of partners to engage in exploratory and applied research that not only generates new knowledge but also refines and enhances best practices, contributes to the inception of new services and technologies, and cultivates capacity through training and collaborative efforts. Discover more about our impactful research initiatives.
The opinions reflected in this post are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Canadian Blood Services, nor do they reflect the opinions of Health Canada or any other funding agency.
How can researchers effectively communicate complex scientific ideas to a broader audience?
The text provided is an insightful overview of the motivations behind the participation of Dr. Chaahat Singh and Dr. Giorgia Caspani in a competition aimed at connecting science with society. Their dialog emphasizes the importance of making scientific research comprehensible and relevant to the public, especially when it concerns critical health issues like Alzheimer’s disease and stem cell transplantation.
### Key Points:
1. **Purpose of Participation**:
– Both researchers view the competition as a vital platform for communicating their findings to the community. It allows them to raise awareness about significant health risks associated with their work.
2. **Theme Significance**:
– The theme “Connecting science with society” resonates deeply with both researchers as it underscores the importance of translating complex scientific ideas into universally understandable concepts and engaging the public in scientific discourse.
3. **Learning Through Writing**:
– The writing process helped both researchers clarify their thoughts and recognize the broader implications of their work, fostering a deeper understanding of the potential societal impacts of their findings.
4. **Future Directions**:
- Chaahat emphasizes the need to further investigate the implications of transporting AD pathology in human scenarios and the necessity for improved informed consent protocols to highlight potential risks.
5. **Advice for Communicating Research**:
– Chaahat recommends clarity and simplicity, employing relatable analogies and storytelling techniques to convey complex ideas effectively. He stresses the importance of patience in refining communication strategies.
6. **Highlighting Research Findings**:
- The prize-winning entry outlined in the text discusses groundbreaking research that suggests the possibility of Alzheimer’s disease transmission through stem cell transplants, thus prompting a reassessment of medical protocols regarding patient safety.
### Conclusion:
The themes of innovation and caution run throughout the discussion. The findings not only have the potential to influence future medical practices concerning stem cell therapies but also underline the imperative role of transparency and public engagement in scientific research. The researchers advocate for an ongoing dialog between science and society to navigate the evolving landscape of medical advancements responsibly.
