ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**Interview with Political Analyst on Recent Trump and Harris Exchange**
**Interviewer:** Welcome! Today, we’re discussing the recent exchange between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris regarding accusations of fascism and authoritarianism. Let’s dive in.
**Analyst:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Trump recently stated, “I am not a Nazi; I am the opposite of a Nazi,” in response to Harris’s comments implying he admires Hitler’s generals. What do you make of this response?
**Analyst:** Trump’s denial reflects a common strategy in political discourse where accusations are met with defiance. By claiming to be the “opposite of a Nazi,” he attempts to rally his base and discredit Harris’s remarks. This kind of language is designed to invoke strong emotional responses, aiming to position himself as a victim of unfounded attacks.
**Interviewer:** Harris characterized Trump as “more unstable and more unhinged,” warning that he poses a danger if re-elected. How significant is this rhetoric, especially in the context of the upcoming elections?
**Analyst:** This rhetoric is highly charged, especially as we’re approaching what could be one of the most consequential elections in U.S. history. Harris’s framing of Trump as a threat is meant to energize Democratic voters and highlight the stakes involved. By emphasizing instability, it raises fears about what a Trump presidency could entail, particularly in terms of democratic norms and checks on power.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned the importance of the elections—what makes this election different from those in 2016 or 2020?
**Analyst:** The current political landscape is deeply polarized, and the issues at play are far more severe. With topics like economic policies, social justice, and international relations at the forefront, voters are facing stark choices. The notion of “there is a lot at stake” resonates because many see the potential for significant changes in the fabric of American democracy under a Trump presidency.
**Interviewer:** can you comment on Harris’s warning that “there will be no one there to stop it“ if Trump returns to power?
**Analyst:** This statement highlights concerns about accountability, especially given recent court rulings that Trump claims grant him immunity. It raises questions about the separation of powers and the role of institutions meant to check presidential authority. Harris’s comments serve as a rallying cry for voters who are worried about the potential erosion of democracy and the rule of law.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights today. It’s clear that the upcoming elections will be pivotal, and how both candidates navigate these accusations will be crucial.
**Analyst:** Absolutely. It will be fascinating to see how these narratives evolve as the elections near. Thank you for having me!