India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, the newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do, on this basis, instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
**2. How can cricket remain a unifying force amidst the tensions and emotions surrounding international matches, as discussed in your interview?**
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Vinod, thank you for joining us. Your recent statements about isolating Pakistan from cricket have sparked quite a debate. Can you explain your position?
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. First and foremost, I want to clarify that I am not an advocate for isolating Pakistan from cricket. My comments were made in light of public sentiment, particularly after critical events like the Pulwama attack. The pressure was immense, with many calling for India to refuse playing against Pakistan.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that there was a fear of losing points if India did not play. Can you elaborate on that situation?
**Vinod Roy:** Certainly. During discussions about the June 16 World Cup match, it was evident that not participating could jeopardize our chances in the tournament. The alternative was to either lose critical points or continue competing, which would be against the backdrop of significant public outcry. My statement about isolating Pakistan was, unfortunately, a political maneuver to navigate these pressures.
**Interviewer:** In your earlier comments, you referenced the treatment of South Africa during apartheid. Many argue that this stance contradicts the Olympic Charter, which promotes sports as a human right. How do you respond to that?
**Vinod Roy:** I understand the concerns. My intent was to highlight the severity of the situation at that time. When emotions run high, particularly after incidents like Pulwama, it can lead to extreme reactions. However, I realize that comparisons to apartheid are not only extreme but also problematic in the context of sports being a unifying force.
**Interviewer:** You also noted that Pakistani players are not included in the IPL. Do you believe this sets a precedent for excluding teams from international competitions?
**Vinod Roy:** The IPL situation is specific to our national interest and security concerns. While I don’t support excluding Pakistani teams from competing internationally, it does reflect the complex dynamics at play. We need to find a way to engage within a framework that allows for competition but respects national sentiments.
**Interviewer:** Given the complexities you’ve outlined, how should cricketing bodies approach relationships with countries facing political tensions?
**Vinod Roy:** I believe neutral venues for matches could be a viable solution. This allows for competition while mitigating political tensions. It’s crucial for cricket to remain a sport and not become a battleground for political disputes.
**Interviewer:** Last question, Vinod—what do you think the future holds for India-Pakistan cricket matches, considering your insights?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s difficult to predict, but there’s hope. Dialogue and diplomatic engagement are essential. If both sides can focus on the sport, perhaps we can foster a better environment for cricket that transcends politics.
—
**Debate Question for Readers:** Considering Vinod Roy’s position and the complexities surrounding cricket’s political landscape, do you believe that sports should be separated from political issues, or are such political stances necessary for the integrity of national sentiment? Share your thoughts!