ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How did Donald Trump’s recent statements at the National Faith Summit respond to Kamala Harris’s accusations about his behavior and beliefs?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump’s Recent Statements Regarding Kamala Harris**
**Interviewer:** Welcome to our show! Today we have political analyst Dr. Emily Sanchez to discuss the recent comments made by former President Donald Trump in response to Vice President Kamala Harris’s accusations. Dr. Sanchez, can you give us an overview of what happened at the recent event in Georgia?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Thank you for having me! At the National Faith Summit held in Powder Springs, Georgia, Donald Trump firmly rejected claims made by Kamala Harris that he admires Adolf Hitler. He stated, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” This response came amidst a highly charged political atmosphere, especially with the presidential elections just days away.
**Interviewer:** Harris has been vocal about her concerns regarding Trump. What did she specifically say that prompted Trump’s reaction?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Kamala Harris has labeled Trump as a potential threat to democracy, suggesting he exhibits “unstable” and “unhinged” behavior. She voiced that he seeks power without accountability and framed the situation as more dire than previous elections. This includes warnings that there may not be sufficient checks on his power if he were to regain the presidency.
**Interviewer:** Trump’s rebuttal emphasized that personal attacks are rampant as we approach the election. Do you think this is a common theme in modern political discourse?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Absolutely. Personal attacks have increasingly become a part of political campaigns, especially in polarized environments like we see today. Candidates often use these tactics to undermine their opponents, which can overshadow substantive policy discussions. It’s particularly noticeable in highly competitive elections like this one.
**Interviewer:** Trump mentioned the Supreme Court’s prior statements about his immunity. What implications do you think this has for the upcoming election?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Trump’s assertion of “immunity” suggests he believes there will be little to no accountability for his actions, which could embolden his supporters. It raises questions about the rule of law and how electoral processes might be handled moving forward. This could definitely influence voter sentiment, particularly among those who prioritize judicial integrity and accountability.
**Interviewer:** In the context of this escalating rhetoric, what should voters keep in mind as they cast their ballots?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Voters need to look beyond the personal attacks and focus on each candidate’s policy proposals and vision for the future. It’s crucial to scrutinize not just what candidates say in response to accusations but also how they plan to address the real issues facing the country. Engaging in informed discussions and fact-checking can help voters navigate this fraught political landscape.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Sanchez, for your insights on this pressing topic. We appreciate you joining us today!
**Dr. Sanchez:** Thank you for having me! It’s always a pleasure to discuss these important issues.
