India‘s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, the newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do, on this basis, instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How can the historical context of political tensions influence the current cricketing relations between India and Pakistan, as discussed by Vinod Roy in this interview?
**Interview with Vinod Roy: The Political Dimensions of Cricketing Relations Between India and Pakistan**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Roy. You’ve stirred quite a conversation with your recent comments regarding India’s stance on isolating Pakistan in cricket. You mentioned that this was a political statement influenced by public opinion. Can you elaborate on that?
**Vinod Roy:** Certainly. The statement about isolating Pakistan was not a genuine desire to exclude them from cricket but rather a response to the sentiments prevailing in the country at that time. The public was quite vocal after incidents such as the Pulwama attack, pushing for a stronger stance against Pakistan.
**Interviewer:** However, some critics argue that your demand for treating Pakistan like South Africa during the apartheid era contradicts the Olympic Charter, which promotes sports as a means of fostering peace. How do you reconcile that?
**Vinod Roy:** I understand those concerns. My intent was not to exclude Pakistan indefinitely but to reflect the intense emotions of the public. While it’s essential to uphold the principles of sportsmanship, we must also consider the context we are operating in. The demand was more about expressing the sentiments of the time rather than a permanent policy.
**Interviewer:** You also mentioned the financial aspects of playing against Pakistan, suggesting that the BCCI might prioritize revenue. Can you clarify this point?
**Vinod Roy:** Yes, the financial realities cannot be ignored. Cricket is not just a sport; it’s also an industry. If we were to refuse to play against Pakistan, we would face significant financial ramifications, especially in high-stakes tournaments like the World Cup. My comments were a strategic response to a complex situation, balancing public sentiment and the practicalities of cricket administration.
**Interviewer:** Given that Pakistani players are barred from participating in the IPL, do you believe this adds to the tensions? How do you see the future of Indo-Pak cricket relations?
**Vinod Roy:** Certainly, the absence of Pakistani players from the IPL adds a layer of complexity. While the current environment may not be conducive to bilateral series, I remain open to the idea of neutral venue matches, which could offer a platform for both nations to compete without the accompanying political baggage.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, do you genuinely believe isolation is the best approach for resolving these tensions, or is there room for dialog in cricket?
**Vinod Roy:** I do not advocate for isolation as a permanent solution. There must be room for dialog, and sports can serve as a catalyst for peace. Engaging in competitions under neutral terms might be a way forward until political climates shift positively.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy, for sharing your insights. It seems clear that the intersection of politics and sports in the case of India and Pakistan is as intricate as ever.
**Debate Question for Readers:** Considering Mr. Roy’s perspective, do you believe that public sentiment should influence sports policies in international cricket, or should sporting organizations prioritize neutrality and the Olympic Charter principles? What are your thoughts on how India and Pakistan can navigate their cricketing relations in the future?