Embracing Marxism After 21: An Embarrassing Trend?
Oh, dear readers, gather around! It appears we’ve stumbled upon a delightful little conundrum that’s bound to pique both our interest and our sense of embarrassment. You see, the irrefutable truth of the matter is this: there comes a time in every individual’s life—a magical age of enlightenment, if you will—when one should perhaps hang up their Marxist critiques like old Christmas jumpers. Yet, here we have “Blindboy Boatclub,” a spry 40-year-old, swinging around his Marxist banner on RTÉ as if he’s just discovered a new tax avoidance scheme. Is there a crisis in our cultural zeitgeist that suggests we’re all still stuck in the compounding absurdities of our university years?
Watching someone parade their political discontent whilst camped out on a state broadcaster isn’t just cringe-worthy; it’s like watching your mate try to dance at a wedding after having one too many shandies. You can feel the awkwardness ripple through the room like a poorly-timed punchline. What’s even more shocking, though, is the notion that airing out these critiques is somehow still revolutionary—like shouting “Free Wi-Fi!” in a packed café. Since when did stating the obvious become a badge of honor?
Aged Like Milk
Now, let’s look a little deeper. The concept of a “Marxist critique of culture” past the tender age of 21… jeez, that’s as fresh as ten-day-old sushi! At some point, you need to ask: when does critical thought stop being a profound introspection and start resembling a sort of nostalgic shriek echoing through the hallowed halls of idealism? Are we truly so terrified of adulthood that we cling to theories more outdated than your dad’s leather jacket?
If Blindboy’s documentary is anything like his previous content, it will be peppered with witticisms and deft observations, which, let’s be honest, often sound better coming from a younger person—mainly because they haven’t had a chance to find out how much taxes sting your wallet. Seriously, this guy is 40! It’s time to apply some of that critical thinking to the cultural critiques we keep regurgitating.
The Cringe is Real
And, oh—what a cringe it is! The documentary is rated “E” for Everyone, which conveniently translates to “sensitive art for adults who still think ‘playing with Legos’ counts as a hobby.” My dear reader, I implore you: when will we collectively retire these tired tropes? At some point, cultural commentary shouldn’t feel like a poorly timed dad joke at an otherwise jovial dinner table.
Here’s a little nugget of wisdom: we’re allowed to grow, to evolve, and yes, even to move beyond Marxism and meme critiques at 22 – and ideally, by 40, we should have more constructive tools at our disposal than the same old saw about capitalism being the culprit behind… well, everything.
In Conclusion
So, what’s the takeaway here? It’s perfectly fine to have ideals and critiques, just perhaps with a sprinkle of practicality and a good measure of self-awareness. Let’s save the Marxist rants for the pub conversations we all have, post-pint, rather than broadcasting them with a flourish on state television. Because, at the end of the day, you wouldn’t wear last decade’s trends, so why keep dragging out old ideological critiques? Let’s embrace growth, shall we?
Already a member? Sign in here
The dilemma lies in determining what’s more cringe-worthy: continuing to voice “Marxist” critiques of culture as an adult over the age of 21, or mistakenly believing that expressing such views on the Irish State broadcaster constitutes a bold and edgy stance, as if these are topics shrouded in taboo that might lead to repercussions for the speaker.
This week, the 40-year-old artist known as “Blindboy Boatclub” showcased both mistakes in his latest documentary aired on RTÉ, demonstrating a level of self-awareness that seems strikingly absent. Viewers can brace themselves as the documentary emits an unmistakable wave of cringeworthy moments easily rated “E” for Everyone.
Get unlimited access to Gript
Support Gript and get exclusive content, full archives and an ad-free experience
Already a member? Sign in here
Why do some people believe that Marxism becomes irrelevant after a certain age?
**Interview: The Longevity of Marxism in Modern Discourse**
**Host:** Welcome, viewers, to our special segment where we delve into cultural critiques and social ideologies. Today, we have a fascinating guest, Dr. Elena Rios, a cultural historian and expert in Marxist theory. We’ll be discussing the recent commentary surrounding “Blindboy Boatclub” and the ongoing relevance—or irrelevance—of Marxist thought as one ages.
**Host:** Dr. Rios, thank you for joining us. There seems to be a growing sentiment that embracing Marxism after a certain age—let’s say 21—might be a bit outdated or even embarrassing. What’s your take on this?
**Dr. Rios:** Thank you for having me! The idea that Marxism should be set aside after youth is intriguing, but I would argue it reflects a misunderstanding of Marxism itself. While it’s true that some of the critiques may feel juvenile or overly simplistic, the core tenets of Marxism allow for evolved and nuanced discussions about societal structures at any age.
**Host:** That’s a great point, but when we look at figures like Blindboy—who at 40 is still wielding Marxist rhetoric—is there a sense that he might be stuck in a youthful mindset?
**Dr. Rios:** There’s certainly a question of maturity and the evolution of thought with age. However, many scholars argue that critical thought should never be discarded entirely; rather, it should be developed and deepened over time. It’s not just about clinging to old ideas but engaging with them critically. Marxist theories can adapt to contemporary issues, especially when discussing capitalism’s persistent inequalities.
**Host:** Some viewers describe the discussion around these critiques as feeling cringe-worthy or stale, as if reciting tired tropes. Do you believe that these critiques lose their edge as we grow older?
**Dr. Rios:** I think it’s essential to differentiate between the foundation of Marxist critique and the manner in which it is presented. While some arguments may feel repetitive, much of modern society still grapples with the disparities Marx pointed out over a century ago. The question isn’t whether Marxism has aged, but whether our engagement with it has matured. It’s possible to revisit Marxist critiques with fresh perspectives, integrating new social realities into the conversation.
**Host:** So, would you say there’s a path forward for those like Blindboy? How can they articulate their thoughts more constructively?
**Dr. Rios:** Absolutely. The key is to interlace personal experiences and current events with Marxist theories. For someone like Blindboy, recognizing the intersection of personal and political issues can transform the narrative. It’s about moving beyond simple proclamations about capitalism and exploring the underlying systems that perpetuate inequality—like class, race, and gender dynamics in a modern context.
**Host:** do you think there’s a danger in dismissing Marxism as merely a phase that should be outgrown?
**Dr. Rios:** Yes, there’s significant danger in that. Dismissing these critiques can lead to a lack of critical engagement with our societal structures. Instead of seeing Marxism as a relic of youth, we should encourage dialog that evolves over time. It’s all about fostering a culture that values continuous learning and reflection on ideological frameworks regardless of age.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Rios, for your insights. It sounds like the dialog around Marxism is far from over, regardless of how old we get.
**Dr. Rios:** Exactly! Critical engagement is a lifelong process, and it should be embraced at every stage of life.
**Host:** That’s a wrap for today’s interview. Stay tuned for more discussions that challenge our perspectives and invite us to think critically about the world around us!
