The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, declared himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How does Nayib Bukele’s overwhelming victory reflect the political polarization in El Salvador, and what implications does this have for the future of opposition parties in the country?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Gonzalez on Bukele’s Victory in the 2024 Elections**
**Interviewer:** Good afternoon, Dr. Gonzalez. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent re-election of El Salvador’s president Nayib Bukele. He has claimed victory with over 85% of the votes—what are your initial thoughts on this remarkable outcome?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. Nayib Bukele’s announcement of winning with more than 85% is indeed striking. It underscores both his popularity and the polarizing political landscape in El Salvador. His victory speech and the celebrations highlight how deeply he has connected with his base. However, it’s important to note that his path to re-election involved some controversial legal maneuvers which bypassed constitutional restrictions. This raises significant questions about the health of democratic processes in El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** Bukele’s method of securing re-election, despite constitutional barriers, has sparked considerable debate. How do you see this move affecting the perception of democracy in the region?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** It could have serious implications. On one hand, Bukele’s supporters argue that his continuation in office reflects the electorate’s desire for stability and effective governance, especially given the challenges the country faces. On the other hand, the legal workaround may set a concerning precedent for future leaders in the region. It could be seen as undermining democratic institutions and the rule of law, which can lead to increased polarization and unrest.
**Interviewer:** The opposition parties seem to have received a significantly smaller share of the vote, with the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front and the National Republican Alliance trailing far behind. What does this concentration of votes in favor of Bukele say about the current political climate?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** The overwhelming support for Bukele may indicate a consolidation of political power and the disenchantment of voters with traditional parties, such as the FMLN and Arena, which have struggled with corruption and inefficiency. However, it also suggests that a substantial portion of the population is rallying behind a central figure amidst fears of crime and economic instability. This can create a scenario where political dissent is minimized, and opposition voices are marginalized, which is concerning for a healthy democracy.
**Interviewer:** As someone observing these developments, what question do you think our readers should consider that could spark further debate on this issue?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** I think it’s crucial for readers to ponder: What are the long-term consequences of a leader circumventing constitutional limits in pursuit of re-election? Will this strengthen or weaken democracy in El Salvador and the region as a whole? This question opens the floor to debates about the balance between effective leadership and adherence to democratic principles.
