In the two weeks following Donald Trump‘s reelection as president, the former leader has made a series of puzzling appointments to his second-term advisory and cabinet roster, inciting widespread bewilderment that can be aptly characterized by four words: What the actual fuck. Among his controversial choices, Trump has nominated a fervent anti-vaccine advocate for the nation’s top health post, selected an individual facing allegations of sexual conduct with a minor* to serve as attorney general, and designated a reality television personality, known for her involvement in Real World, to oversee the Transportation Department. To the surprise of many, he has also chosen a figure primarily recognized as a wrestling executive to lead the Department of Education.
Linda McMahon, Trump’s pick for the Department of Education, possesses strikingly limited qualifications for the role. As reported by The Washington Post, in a shocking twist, McMahon previously claimed to have obtained an education degree in 2009—a statement that was later revealed to be completely false. Additionally, she reflects the legacy of numerous Trump appointments by being linked to at least one notorious scandal. New York Magazine noted issues surrounding her tenure:
The McMahons and WWE have denied all wrongdoing. Linda stepped down from her executive position at WWE in 2009 to run for Senate in Connecticut, resulting in unsuccessful bids in 2010 and 2012.
The contentious background of her husband, Vince McMahon, is noteworthy as well; he has faced multiple accusations of sexual misconduct and infidelity throughout his career. In 2022, The Wall Street Journal disclosed that he had disbursed over $12 million in hush money across 16 years aimed at silencing various allegations. Just two years later, a former WWE employee launched a lawsuit against him, alleging he offered her a job in exchange for sex and reportedly trafficked her to other men. This lawsuit is currently on hold while federal prosecutors investigate the allegations of trafficking. McMahon has categorically denied all claims made against him.
In other cabinet news, Trump announced on Tuesday the appointment of Dr. Mehmet Oz, widely recognized for promoting health misinformation and dubious health products, to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Additionally, he has recruited Howard Lutnick, CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a notable supporter of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.‘s anti-vaccine positions, to serve as commerce secretary.
*Matt Gaetz denies this.
If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.
What impact do Linda McMahon’s past claims about her education have on public perception of her suitability as Secretary of Education?
**Interview with Political Analyst, Sarah Thompson**
**Host:** Good evening, and welcome to our special segment on current political affairs. We’re here today with political analyst Sarah Thompson to discuss the recent cabinet appointments made by President Donald Trump just two weeks after his reelection. In your view, why have these choices incited such bewilderment among the public and political commentators?
**Sarah Thompson:** Thank you for having me. The appointments President Trump has made, particularly the selection of a notable anti-vaccine advocate for the health post, a controversial figure for attorney general, and a reality TV star for the Transportation Department, have certainly raised eyebrows. Many people see these decisions as prioritizing loyalty or celebrity over expertise, which is not only unconventional but also potentially detrimental.
**Host:** One appointment that stands out is Linda McMahon as Secretary of Education. With her background primarily in professional wrestling and with questionable claims about her qualifications, how do you interpret this choice?
**Sarah Thompson:** McMahon’s appointment is perplexing to many, especially considering her claim of holding an education degree that was later proven false. Education is such a critical area for any administration, and selecting someone with minimal relevant qualifications raises serious questions about the administration’s commitment to educational reform and policy. It seems to echo a pattern we’ve seen in other appointments where personal connections and past support for Trump take precedence over traditional qualifications [[1](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/trump-administration-appointees/)].
**Host:** Indeed. It’s also worth mentioning the controversies surrounding her husband, Vince McMahon. How do you think that will influence her role, given the ongoing allegations against him?
**Sarah Thompson:** Vince McMahon’s background does cast a long shadow over Linda’s appointment. The allegations of misconduct and hush money payments associated with him, coupled with the controversies of their shared professional history, could lead to complications both personally for her and politically. It raises concerns about ethics and integrity within the cabinet, especially in a role that impacts education policies affecting millions of children [[1](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/trump-administration-appointees/)].
**Host:** Looking ahead, how do you foresee these appointments influencing public trust in the government, particularly in institutions like the Department of Education?
**Sarah Thompson:** Trust in government institutions could erode further if these appointments are perceived as nepotism or favoritism rather than merit-based choices. Education is already a highly politicized field, and McMahon’s lack of direct experience could exacerbate skepticism towards the government’s ability to effectively manage and reform educational policies. The public may feel that their concerns aren’t being taken seriously if such appointments continue [[1](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/trump-administration-appointees/)].
**Host:** Thank you for those insights, Sarah. It appears we may be in for a contentious term ahead. We appreciate your time and expertise on this matter.
**Sarah Thompson:** Thank you for having me. It’s certainly an interesting time in politics, and it will be worth watching how these appointments unfold in the coming months.
**Host:** That’s all for today’s segment. Stay tuned for more updates as we continue to follow these significant developments.
