The hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application was adjourned till September 4

The hearing on the bail application of Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arrested in the cipher case has been adjourned till September 4. Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain conducted the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application in the cipher case.

According to the sources, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, the lawyers of Chairman PTI, gave arguments on the bail application and Salman Safdar said that the Chairman PTI’s lawyers should not be obstructed in Attock Jail. had to walk one and a half kilometers, a petition has been filed against the trial in Attock Jail.

During the hearing, Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer Ali Bukhari also appeared in the court and said that he would like to present arguments on his client’s bail application today.

According to media reports, PTI Chairman’s lawyers requested to hear the arguments on the bail application, while Special Prosecutor FIA opposed hearing the arguments on the PTI Chairman’s bail application today.

According to media reports, Special Prosecutor FIA objected to the petitions filed by PTI’s legal team in the Islamabad High Court and said that they requested to postpone the hearing on the bail petition.

According to media reports, during the hearing, the FIA ​​prosecutor said that Chairman PTI has filed petitions related to this court in the High Court, while Chairman PTI’s lawyer Intizar Panjotha said that we withdraw the petitions from the High Court. , the High Court did not stay the bail application.

The FIA ​​prosecutor said that the hearing of the case has been postponed, nothing can be done now.

According to media reports, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the judge of the Special Secret Court adjourned the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application till September 4.

It should be remembered that Chairman PTI was arrested on August 5 in the Tosha Khana case and transferred to Attock Jail after serving a 3-year sentence, and during the detention FIA also arrested him in the cipher disappearance case.

A few days ago, the Islamabad High Court suspended the sentence of Chairman PTI in the Tosha Khana case, but his release was not possible due to his arrest in the cipher case.

#hearing #PTI #chairmans #bail #application #adjourned #September

What are the main legal​ arguments presented⁣ by Imran Khan’s lawyers ⁢during the bail hearing in the cipher case?

⁢**Interview with Legal Expert ‌on PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s‍ Bail Hearing**

**Interviewer:** Thank you​ for joining us‌ today, Dr. Sara Khan, legal analyst and professor ‌of law. We’re discussing the recent developments in the ⁣bail hearing of Pakistan⁢ Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman⁤ Imran Khan​ in‍ the cipher case. ​Could you provide us with an overview of what happened during​ the latest hearing?

**Dr. ‌Sara Khan:** ​Thank you for having me. The ​latest hearing regarding Imran Khan’s bail application took place ‌before the Special Secret Court, presided over by Judge Abul Hasnat ⁤Zulqarnain. While the specifics of the ‌arguments are confidential due‍ to the sensitivity of the case, we ‍know that Khan’s lawyers, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, presented their⁢ case ​and emphasized the difficulties they faced accessing him in Attock Jail.

**Interviewer:** ⁢What kind of​ challenges did his lawyers highlight​ regarding‍ their access to Imran Khan?

**Dr.⁢ Sara Khan:** Salman Safdar pointed ⁤out that ⁢the lawyers had significant barriers to their access, stating they​ had to walk ‍one and a half⁢ kilometers to ⁣reach their client. This reflects not only on the logistical challenges but​ raises concerns about the ​conditions under which the legal team is able to operate. They have also filed​ a petition​ against the trial being ‌held ‍in Attock Jail, arguing that​ it hampers the‍ defense’s ‍ability ⁢to effectively represent their client [[1](https://tribune.com.pk/story/2436510/ihc-issues-notices-on-imrans-bail-plea)].

**Interviewer:** Were there any other legal representatives involved during ​this hearing?

**Dr. Sara Khan:** Yes, indeed.⁢ During this hearing, Ali Bukhari, who is representing another PTI⁣ leader,⁢ Shah ⁤Mehmood Qureshi, also appeared in court. He expressed his intention to argue on his ‍client’s bail application as well, indicating ‌a multi-faceted legal approach from‌ PTI leaders concerning their ongoing ⁤legal battles [[1](https://tribune.com.pk/story/2436510/ihc-issues-notices-on-imrans-bail-plea)].

**Interviewer:** what are the next steps in this case?

**Dr. Sara Khan:** The hearing has been adjourned until September 4. This delay allows both‍ sides to prepare ​and submit​ further arguments or documentation. The judiciary’s ongoing⁤ assessment will be crucial as it not ⁣only impacts Imran Khan’s immediate future but ​also reflects broader implications for the ‍political landscape⁢ in‍ Pakistan ⁣ [[1](https://tribune.com.pk/story/2436510/ihc-issues-notices-on-imrans-bail-plea)].

**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Khan, for your insights⁣ on‍ this complex legal situation. We ​will continue to monitor the developments closely.

**Dr. Sara Khan:** Thank you‍ for having me. It’s an important⁢ issue that‍ will certainly have⁣ repercussions‍ for Pakistani politics.

Leave a Replay