Brasilia, Nov 13 (EFE).- The Brazilian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mauro Vieira, stated this Wednesday in an appearance in Congress that, despite the clear deterioration of Brazil‘s relations with Venezuela, the current moment has to be one of dialogue and not to break relations with the neighboring country.
“Although circumstances impose an inevitable decrease in the dynamism of relations, that does not mean that Brazil has to break relations with Venezuela or something of that nature,” said the chancellor in reference to Caracas’ recent decision to recall its ambassador. in Brasilia for consultations.
Vieira added that the Venezuelan ambassador was not permanently removed from the country, that the Brazilian ambassador in Caracas remains in her position and has very good relations with the Venezuelan authorities, and that he himself continues to maintain contacts with his counterpart from the neighboring country.
“On the contrary, the current moment is one of dialogue, negotiation and non-isolation, which are key to a peaceful solution to the crisis in Venezuela,” he assured.
Relations began to deteriorate since the presidential elections last July because the Government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva did not recognize the victory granted by the Venezuelan electoral body to President Nicolás Maduro, and they worsened in October when Brazil vetoed Venezuela’s entry. to the BRICS as a full member after the bloc’s summit held in Russia.
Since then, different Venezuelan authorities have harshly criticized Lula.
Vieira said that Brazil is not obliged to recognize Maduro’s supposed victory in the presidential elections because, by tradition, the country does not recognize governments but states.
«The current moment is delicate and requires professionalism and caution from diplomacy. Brazil’s practice is to recognize States and not governments. It is a tradition that seeks to avoid the politicization of the recognition or non-recognition of a foreign Government,” he assured.
According to the chancellor, Brazil has insisted on dialogue with Venezuela and other countries about the Venezuelan crisis not only because it is an important neighbor but also because it was guarantor of the Barbados Agreement, in which the Government and opposition defined the bases for the elections of this year, and because, at Maduro’s invitation, he was an election observer.
He added, however, that the solution to the crisis has to be “constructed” by the Venezuelans themselves and not imposed from outside with more sanctions and isolation.
«We already saw that that does not work. We cannot repeat the mistakes of the time when Juan Guaidó was proclaimed interim president. There were two presidents, but one only had a title and did not have a country to govern,” he said.
“That has nothing to do with interference or recognition of something political but rather the needs of a relationship,” he said.
.
#Brazilian #foreign #minister #current #moment #demands #dialogue #break #Venezuela
How could the ongoing dialogue between Brazil and Venezuela influence regional stability in South America?
**Interview with Dr. Ana Silva, Expert in Latin American Relations**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Silva. In light of recent comments by Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira regarding Brazil’s relationship with Venezuela, what do you think about his call for dialogue at this time?
**Dr. Ana Silva:** Thank you for having me. Minister Vieira’s emphasis on dialogue is certainly a pragmatic approach, especially in this context of heightened tensions. Although official relations have soured, it’s important for both countries to maintain communication channels, not only to address bilateral issues but also to foster regional stability.
**Editor:** Vieira mentioned the “inevitable decrease in the dynamism of relations” but emphasized that Brazil should not sever ties. What does this imply for future diplomatic efforts?
**Dr. Silva:** This suggests that while Brazil is acknowledging the complexities of its relationship with Venezuela, including the non-recognition of recent electoral outcomes, it still prioritizes diplomacy over isolation. Vieira’s stance might help to pave the way for constructive dialogue on pressing issues, such as the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela and potential cooperation in trade or security.
**Editor:** How might Brazil’s recent actions, like vetoing Venezuela’s admission to BRICS, affect this dialogue?
**Dr. Silva:** The veto certainly reflects Brazil’s current political stance and its concerns about democracy in Venezuela. However, it can also be viewed as a tactical move to exert pressure for reforms. The key will be whether both governments can compartmentalize these disputes and focus on mutual interests, so the dialogue can remain productive despite these underlying tensions.
**Editor:** What do you see as the potential outcomes of this dialogue that Vieira advocates for?
**Dr. Silva:** Ideally, this dialogue could lead to a de-escalation of tensions and perhaps even open avenues for collaboration on issues like trade and immigration. It might also be a step towards addressing the broader regional impact of Venezuela’s crisis, enabling Brazil to play a more active role in seeking sustainable solutions. Dialogue is essential not only for immediate resolution but also for laying the groundwork for long-term peace and cooperation in the region.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Silva, for your insights on this important topic. We’re looking forward to seeing how the situation unfolds.
**Dr. Silva:** Thank you for having me. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this critical issue.