The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What strategies did Nayib Bukele use to secure such a high percentage of votes despite constitutional restrictions on re-election?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Torres on Nayib Bukele’s Recent Election Victory**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Torres. President Nayib Bukele has proclaimed himself the winner of the recent elections in El Salvador with an impressive 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on how he managed to secure such a commanding lead, especially given the constitutional restrictions on re-election?
**Dr. Torres:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s strategy of leveraging a legal loophole to run again has certainly sparked controversy. His ability to connect with the electorate on social media has also played a crucial role in solidifying his popularity. Many voters seem to prioritize stability and a strong leader, which Bukele has presented himself as.
**Editor:** You mentioned controversy—do you think this election raises any ethical concerns about the integrity of the democratic process in El Salvador?
**Dr. Torres:** Absolutely. There are significant concerns about the erosion of democratic norms. The fact that he managed to sidestep a constitutional barrier raises questions about the rule of law and what this means for future elections. It’s essential for the public to reflect on whether they want a precedent set where leaders can manipulate the system for personal advantage.
**Editor:** Given Bukele’s overwhelming victory and the substantial gap between him and his opponents, how do you think this will affect the political landscape in El Salvador moving forward?
**Dr. Torres:** Bukele’s dominance could lead to a more polarized political environment. His party, New Ideas, now has the mandate to push through significant reforms, but opposition parties, like the FMLN and Arena, may become more vocal in their dissent. The question remains: will this usher in a new era of governance or exacerbate tensions?
**Editor:** Lastly, given these developments, what do you think the general public should consider when evaluating Bukele’s presidency?
**Dr. Torres:** I think the public should critically assess the implications of such a mandate on democratic freedoms and civil liberties. While Bukele has enjoyed popularity, it’s vital for citizens to engage in discussions about the long-term impacts of his policies and governance style. Is the public truly benefiting, or are we witnessing a shift towards autocracy under the guise of populism?
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insights. To our readers: What do you think about Nayib Bukele’s re-election and the implications it has for democracy in El Salvador? Is this a victory for the people, or does it signal trouble ahead for democratic principles? Let’s hear your thoughts.