As soon as he becomes president, Trump’s first target will be the Pentagon, including the military chief

After the victory of the former American president in the presidential election in the United States, the news of Donald Trump and his loyalists are intertwined on the world scene. Elon Musk, who criticized Donald Trump in the past, found his way into the White House, while now there are reports that top positions in the Pentagon, such as the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard, etc., are going to be furloughed because Donald With Trump assuming the presidency, several officers including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be dismissed.

In the United States, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the head of the armed forces.

According to the foreign news agency “Reuters”, two independent sources confirmed that a list has been prepared, including the name of the chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, who will be dismissed.

It should be noted that Trump will take office as the President of the United States on November 5, and a source in his new administration confirmed that the news of a major change in the Pentagon has caused a stir throughout the organization and that the list being prepared is small. There is also the possibility of change.

Earlier in his election campaign, Donald Trump has given a threatening message to those military journals that criticized the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2021.

Another source said the incoming administration would likely focus on U.S. military officers linked to Trump’s former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley.

Mark Milley was quoted in Bob Woodward’s book “War,” published last month, in which Trump was described as “fundamentally fascist” and Trump’s allies considered him to be with the former president. He was targeted for infidelity.

Another source said that any person or official who received a position from Mark Milley will be fired. According to sources, the list of people who have been supported by Mark Milley is long.

It should be noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest position in the US military and includes the heads of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard and Space Force.

The plans to fire senior leaders of the US armed forces were revealed a day before the presidential election when Trump chose Pat Hegseth as his defense secretary.

Pat Hegseth has been a Fox News commentator and veteran who has expressed his intention to purge the Pentagon of undesirables.

#president #Trumps #target #Pentagon #including #military #chief

What are the potential‌ consequences of Trump’s military leadership changes on ⁤U.S.⁣ foreign policy?

‍ **News Editor**: Today, we‌ have the pleasure of speaking with political analyst Dr. Linda Cartwright, who specializes in U.S. military and foreign relations, to unpack⁢ the recent developments following Donald ‍Trump’s return to⁢ the presidency. Thank you⁣ for joining us, Dr. Cartwright.

**Dr. Cartwright**: Thank you for having ⁤me!

**News Editor**: There’s a lot to unpack ⁢since Trump’s election victory. First off, can you comment on the‌ implications of the ⁢reports about key Pentagon positions being furloughed and possible​ dismissals, especially concerning the Chairman of the⁢ Joint ‍Chiefs of Staff?

**Dr. Cartwright**: Absolutely. The‍ Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of​ Staff ‍plays a crucial role in advising the president on military matters.​ The potential dismissals signal a significant shift in military leadership and ​could lead to alterations in⁣ both ⁢domestic and international military ⁤strategies. It’s possible that Trump is looking to ⁤appoint individuals who align more closely with his administration’s vision and policies.

**News Editor**: Given Trump’s past relationship with⁤ figures ‌like Elon⁢ Musk, what do you‌ think this means for civilian-military relations under⁤ his presidency?

**Dr. Cartwright**:⁢ Trump’s collaboration ⁢with someone ‍like Musk, despite previous criticisms,​ indicates a⁣ willingness⁢ to bridge gaps and‌ utilize influential figures in areas like technology and‍ innovation. However, ⁢the abrupt changes in ⁤military leadership could⁤ strain civilian-military ⁤relations. If⁢ the military feels⁢ it’s​ being⁢ politicized, it may lead to tensions and a decrease in operational effectiveness.

**News Editor**: That’s ‌an interesting point. What‍ impact might this⁢ have ⁤on⁤ U.S. foreign policy, particularly in terms of military alliances?

**Dr. Cartwright**: The U.S. military’s‌ posture under a new⁤ command could redefine ​its approach to allies and ​adversaries alike. If​ Trump‍ appoints military leaders who are more hawkish or aligned⁢ with isolationist views, we might see a ‍significant re-evaluation ‌of defense commitments to‌ NATO and other ⁢alliances.⁤ Allies may feel uncertain about U.S. support, while adversaries may‌ take this shift as an opportunity⁤ to test U.S. resolve.

**News Editor**: do you anticipate ‌any major upheaval in the internal dynamics of the military⁢ with these changes?

**Dr. Cartwright**: Yes, I do.​ Every ‌leadership change ⁢can⁢ bring about a cultural shift, particularly⁤ in an institution as hierarchical and tradition-bound as the military. If Trump pushes for loyalty over experience, we may see ⁤a decline in morale among career military professionals, which ⁢could have‍ long-lasting effects on military readiness and ⁢integrity.

**News ⁢Editor**: Thank⁢ you, Dr. Cartwright, for shedding light on these complex‍ issues. It will be interesting to see ⁤how these developments evolve under Trump’s administration.

**Dr. Cartwright**: Thank ​you for having me. I look⁣ forward to seeing⁣ how this unfolds.

Leave a Replay