The hearing on the bail application of Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arrested in the cipher case has been adjourned till September 4. Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain conducted the hearing on PTI chairman‘s bail application in the cipher case.
According to the sources, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, the lawyers of Chairman PTI, argued on the bail application and Salman Safdar said that the Chairman PTI’s lawyers should not be obstructed in Attock Jail. had to walk one and a half kilometers, a petition has been filed against the trial in Attock Jail.
During the hearing, Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer Ali Bukhari also appeared in the court and said that he would like to give arguments on his client’s bail application today.
According to media reports, PTI chairman’s lawyers requested to hear the arguments on the bail application, while special prosecutor FIA opposed hearing the arguments on the PTI chairman’s bail application today.
According to media reports, Special Prosecutor FIA objected to the petitions filed by PTI’s legal team in the Islamabad High Court and said that they requested to postpone the hearing on the bail petition.
According to media reports, during the hearing, the FIA prosecutor said that Chairman PTI has filed petitions related to this court in the High Court, while Chairman PTI’s lawyer Intizar Panjotha said that we withdraw the petitions from the High Court. , the High Court did not stay the bail application.
The FIA prosecutor said that the hearing of the case has been postponed, nothing can be done now.
According to media reports, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the judge of the Special Secret Court adjourned the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application till September 4.
It should be remembered that Chairman PTI was arrested and transferred to Attock Jail after serving 3 years in the Tosha Khana case on August 5 and FIA also arrested him in the Cipher missing case while in custody.
A few days ago, the Islamabad High Court had suspended the sentence of Chairman PTI in the Tosha Khana case, but his release was not possible due to his arrest in the cipher case.
#hearing #PTI #chairmans #bail #application #adjourned #September
How might the treatment of the PTI Chairman in Attock Jail affect the outcome of his bail hearing?
**Interview with Legal Expert on the Bail Hearing of PTI Chairman**
**Editor:** We have with us today legal expert, Dr. Rizwan Malik, to discuss the recent developments in the bail hearing of the Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), who has been arrested in relation to the cipher case. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Malik.
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me.
**Editor:** The hearing was adjourned until September 4. What does this mean for the PTI Chairman and his legal team?
**Dr. Malik:** This adjournment gives the legal team more time to prepare their argument and gather evidence. It’s not uncommon for hearings to be postponed, especially in high-profile cases like this. The delay will allow the lawyers to strengthen their case and potentially address any issues raised during the hearing.
**Editor:** During the hearing, arguments were made regarding the treatment of the PTI Chairman at Attock Jail. Can you elaborate on that?
**Dr. Malik:** Yes, the lawyers highlighted significant concerns regarding access to legal counsel and conditions within the jail. The fact that they had to walk a considerable distance to meet their client suggests that there might be logistical and possibly legal barriers in place, which could be a point of contention in future hearings and affect their overall case strategy.
**Editor:** Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer also intended to make arguments in court. How does this impact the proceedings?
**Dr. Malik:** The involvement of other PTI leaders, like Shah Mehmood Qureshi, indicates a collective legal strategy among party members. It can create a narrative of solidarity and shared political challenges within the party. If their cases are connected, the outcome could have implications not just for the Chairman but for the party as a whole.
**Editor:** Considering the political environment, how might public opinion influence the judiciary’s decisions in such cases?
**Dr. Malik:** Public opinion can play a significant role, especially in politically charged cases. Media coverage and public sentiment can pressure the judiciary, but a judge’s decision must ultimately be based on the law and the facts presented. However, in a politically sensitive environment, perceptions of fairness and justice become even more critical.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Malik, for your insights on this important legal matter. We’ll continue to follow the case closely as it unfolds.
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential for the public to stay informed about these developments.
