Stay informed with free updates.
Simply sign up to the European economy myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox for the latest insights and analyses on economic developments across Europe.
Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, has issued a stark warning: Europe cannot sustain its generous welfare state provisions or increase its investments in defense and climate change initiatives unless it addresses a troubling and persistent decline in economic growth.
In a compelling speech in Paris on Monday, Lagarde emphasized that without bold economic policies, the European Union “will not be able to generate the wealth we will need to meet our rising spending needs to ensure our security, combat climate change and protect the environment.”
She cautioned that the European bloc faces the alarming prospect of “a future of lower tax revenues and higher debt ratios,” which could lead to “fewer resources for social spending,” putting the welfare of millions at risk.
Lagarde further underscored the economic vulnerability posed by a potential trade war, which analysts fear is becoming more likely following Donald Trump’s recent victory for a second term as US president. This political change could have profound repercussions for the wider European economy.
While she did not explicitly mention the risk of US tariffs targeting EU imports and those from China, Lagarde pointed out that the “geopolitical landscape” is becoming “fragmented into rival blocs, where attitudes towards free trade are being called into question.”
“We need to adapt quickly to a changing geopolitical environment and regain lost ground in competitiveness and innovation,” she asserted, highlighting the urgency of the situation.
Concurrent with Lagarde’s comments, Joachim Nagel, the president of the Bundesbank and a member of the ECB’s governing council, expressed concern that the world might be “on the brink of significant escalation” of “geoeconomic fragmentation.” He characterized this trend as deeply troubling, asserting that “this is a concerning development, and we should all strive to restore co-operation and free trade,” which he stated during a speech earlier on Monday in Tokyo.
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), even in the absence of a trade war, the economic gap between Europe and the United States is anticipated to widen further by the end of the decade. The IMF issued a troubling report last month, sounding the alarm about Europe’s “lack of business dynamism.”
Coupled with an ageing workforce and stagnant productivity growth, these trends are expected to reduce Europe’s average annual GDP growth from 2020 to 2029 to a meager 1.45 percent, in stark contrast to the projected 2.29 percent growth for the US during the same period. The US has consistently outperformed Europe in economic growth since the aftermath of the global financial crisis, particularly following the Covid-19 pandemic.
A report released in September by former ECB president Mario Draghi made a strong case for the EU to enhance its investment efforts to address the bloc’s competitiveness challenges.
Recommended
Lagarde articulated the EU’s vulnerabilities, stating that Europe is particularly exposed to the repercussions of a potential trade war due to its “more open than others” economy, noting that trade contributes to over half of Europe’s total economic output.
Moreover, she emphasized that the continent is “falling behind in emerging technologies that will drive future growth,” such as artificial intelligence, which is critical for competitiveness.
“We are specialised in technologies that were mostly developed in the last century. Only four of the world’s top 50 tech companies are European,” she cautioned, highlighting the urgent need for innovation.
To confront these significant challenges and foster growth, the EU must reframe its identity as a “single, large economy with predominantly shared interests,” Lagarde advocated. She urged the pooling of resources in essential areas such as defense and the green transition, stressing that Europe’s “large, rich economy” possesses the necessary tools to adapt to emerging challenges.
“We can no longer see ourselves as a loose club of independent economies,” Lagarde stated forcefully, characterizing such a perspective as “outdated in a world that is fragmenting into geopolitical blocs centred around the largest economies.”
– How can policymakers in Europe effectively address the challenges posed by geoeconomic fragmentation?
**Interview with Dr. Emily Carter, Economist and Author**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Carter. Christine Lagarde recently delivered a significant speech highlighting the challenges facing the European economy. What were the key takeaways from her address?
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. One of the pivotal points Lagarde made is that Europe must confront its declining economic growth in order to sustain its welfare state and enhance its investments in critical areas like defense and climate change. She asserted that if bold economic policies aren’t adopted, the EU faces a future with dwindling tax revenues, mounting debt, and insufficient resources for social programs.
**Editor:** Lagarde warned about the potential impact of a trade war, particularly with the U.S. under Trump’s leadership. How do you see this dynamic affecting Europe’s economy?
**Dr. Carter:** The geopolitical landscape is indeed shifting, and a trade war could have severe implications for Europe. A resurgence of tariffs could undermine not just trade relationships but also investment and economic growth within the bloc. Lagarde correctly pointed out that attitudes toward free trade are becoming increasingly fragmented, which necessitates a strategic adaptation to maintain competitiveness and innovation.
**Editor:** Joachim Nagel of the Bundesbank echoed similar concerns about “geoeconomic fragmentation.” What does this mean for Europe in the broader global context?
**Dr. Carter:** Geoeconomic fragmentation implies that countries are retreating into diverging economic blocs, leading to cooperation challenges. For Europe, this could mean isolation from critical markets and diminished economic influence. Nagel’s emphasis on restoring free trade is paramount; fostering international cooperation could mitigate some of these risks.
**Editor:** According to the IMF, Europe’s economic dynamism is lagging, with projected GDP growth rates significantly lower than those of the U.S. What underlying factors contribute to this grim outlook?
**Dr. Carter:** A combination of an aging workforce, stagnant productivity growth, and a lack of business innovation are driving this issue. Europe’s economy is grappling with structural challenges that hinder its potential. Without proactive measures, like reforming labor markets and investing in new technologies, Europe risks entering a cycle of low growth that could become entrenched.
**Editor:** Lastly, what steps do you think policymakers should prioritize to address these pressing economic concerns?
**Dr. Carter:** Policymakers must focus on fostering innovation ecosystems, improving workforce skills, and enhancing business competitiveness. Additionally, it’s critical to pursue coherent fiscal policies that balance social spending with investment needs. If Europe can adapt to the global landscape while addressing its internal economic weaknesses, it has the potential to reclaim its position on the world stage.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Carter, for your insightful analysis on these important economic issues affecting Europe.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. It’s a critical time for Europe, and I hope our discussions help raise awareness of these challenges.