The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might Nayib Bukele’s overwhelming electoral victory impact the strategies and future of traditional political parties like FMLN and Arena?
**Interview with Political Analyst Juan Torres on Nayib Bukele’s Recent Election Victory**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Juan. As we’ve just learned, Nayib Bukele has proclaimed a decisive victory in the recent elections with more than 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on the implications of this overwhelming support?
**Juan Torres:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s proclamation of victory certainly indicates a strong backing from the electorate, but it also raises questions about the political landscape in El Salvador. His ability to secure such a large share of votes, especially while circumventing constitutional restrictions on re-election, highlights a rather concerning trend in democratic governance.
**Interviewer:** Indeed, and many observers have pointed to the legal maneuver he employed to run again. How do you think this affects the perception of democracy in El Salvador?
**Juan Torres:** It could lead to a perception of weakened democratic institutions if leaders can bend rules to their advantage. While many may celebrate Bukele’s popularity, this situation might set a precedent where future leaders feel entitled to exploit legal loopholes. It creates a slippery slope for democracy and could invite criticism both domestically and internationally.
**Interviewer:** And considering the context of his opponents, with the FMLN and Arena significantly trailing, how might this influence political opposition moving forward?
**Juan Torres:** This result indicates a clear partisan divide and may demoralize traditional parties, leading them to rethink their strategies. However, it also provides an opportunity for them to regroup, reflect on their policies, and articulate a compelling alternative to Bukele’s platform. A healthy debate will be crucial for the future political development of El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** As we reflect on these developments, what do you think the citizens of El Salvador should be debating right now?
**Juan Torres:** I believe readers should consider whether overwhelming electoral victories, like Bukele’s, truly represent the will of the people or if they mask deeper issues such as political polarization and erosion of democratic norms. How do citizens weigh the benefits of strong leadership against the potential long-term consequences for freedom and democracy? This is a crucial debate for the future of El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Juan, for your insights. This certainly opens up a broader discussion about democracy and governance in El Salvador. What do you all think? Is this victory a sign of a healthy democracy or a cause for concern?
