2024-11-17 14:49:00
In a radio interview this Sunday, the head of ANSES, mariano delos hero,disclose “Former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner raised $35,255,297 in November,” This figure was reached because the former official provided a certificate to ANSES Rio Gallegos addresswhich is why they added a “The Southern Region grant is 6,354,523 pesos.”
The issue is relevant because the national government this week ordered a moratorium on payments for public works to Lázaro Baez’s company following the approval of Fernández de Kirchner’s second conviction in the highway case, but as stated Noted author: De los Heros “If it happens, it happens”, The plan Ignacio Ortelli In Rivadavia, “Christina Kirchner’s situation is not a retirement or a pension, but an ex-gratia allowance.”
ANSES officials believe “It would be appropriate to repeal the provision providing for lifetime stipends for the President and former Vice-President, whose salaries are equivalent to those of state ministers.”
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Mariano de los Heros, head of ANSES, spoke on Radio Rivadavia. “The fees charged by Cristina Kirchner are equivalent to 139 minimum pensions, 388 universal child benefits and 21 maximum pensions, but all of them are subject to judicial review,” De Los Heroes said.
When asked about vested rights, he said “An acquired right exists so long as the conditions giving rise to that right are maintained.”
Javier Mire government suspends Cristina Kirchner’s privileged retirement
He also spoke about the salary received by relatives of Carlos Menem, noting that in this case “Menem died as a senator and the criminal case ended in death. As far as Zulema Yoma is concerned, there are no insulting clauses in it like there is for Christina.
According to Delos Heroes, the grounds for removing the former president “exists in the final judgment, condemning him for the crime of endangering public administration and the crime of illegal increase of assets”, Refer to the Supreme Court decision in the Roads case.
“The existence of a possible special appeal does not in any way diminish the existence of the final judgment,” Hero de los argued, reiterating that “this is not a pension or pension, but an ex-gratia allowance granted by law to the president and former presidents”. But they were not donations per se, the court said ad nauseam. “They are not pension benefits.”
Likewise, he noted: “As in donation, if someone attacks the donor, there is a so-called insult as a ground for revocation of the donation. Here, insult has been criminalized by double compliance and has received the ultimate ordinary The examples have been finished.
Finally, the official asserted that cultural change will also affect justice, which he hopes will lead to a review of the accountability of power agencies. “Everything is an abuse of rights and we are used to it. Let us all be equal before the law,” he concluded.
Not applicable/HB
1731855756
#CFK #raises #35M #November #Río #Gallegos #address #adds #Southern #Region
What led to the decision to provide former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner with an ex-gratia allowance instead of a traditional pension?
**Interview with Mariano de los Heros, Head of ANSES**
*Interviewer:* Thank you for joining us today, Mariano. You recently disclosed that former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner received over $35 million in November. Can you explain how this amount was calculated?
*Mariano de los Heros:* Thank you for having me. The figure of $35,255,297 was reached after Cristina Kirchner provided a specific certificate to ANSES concerning her address in Río Gallegos. This included a grant from the Southern Region, which totals 6,354,523 pesos.
*Interviewer:* There has been a significant context surrounding this payment, especially with the government’s decision to impose a moratorium on public works payments linked to Lázaro Baez’s company. How do these circumstances affect Kirchner’s allowances?
*Mariano de los Heros:* It’s a complex situation. While there are legal decisions affecting public works funding, we need to clarify that what she receives is not a retirement or pension but an ex-gratia allowance. This distinction is crucial.
*Interviewer:* Some officials at ANSES have suggested repealing lifetime stipends for former presidents and vice-presidents. What are your thoughts on this?
*Mariano de los Heros:* I believe it is indeed appropriate to reconsider such provisions. When we look at the salaries and benefits aligned with political roles, especially those equivalent to state ministers, it invites a necessary discussion about equity in public compensation.
*Interviewer:* You’ve mentioned that the payments made to Kirchner could be subject to judicial review. What implications does this have for her financial support?
*Mariano de los Heros:* Correct, the payments she receives, which equate to 139 minimum pensions, 388 universal child benefits, and 21 maximum pensions, are under judicial scrutiny. This means that if any of these benefits are disputed legally, the future of her financial allowances could be impacted.
*Interviewer:* Lastly, you noted that “an acquired right exists as long as the conditions giving rise to that right are maintained.” How does this principle apply in Kirchner’s case?
*Mariano de los Heros:* This principle indicates that as long as the legal frameworks and conditions for her allowances persist, she maintains her rights to those payments. However, shifts in policy or legal judgments could alter that status significantly.
*Interviewer:* Thank you, Mariano, for your insights on this important issue.
*Mariano de los Heros:* Thank you for the opportunity to discuss it.