Nayib Bukele was proclaimed winner of the general elections in El Salvador

The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.

“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.

Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.

The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.

With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.

Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.

What are the key factors contributing to⁣ Nayib Bukele’s popularity among supporters despite criticism of his governance‌ style?

**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Gonzalez on Nayib ‌Bukele’s Election Victory**

**Interviewer:** Welcome, Dr. Gonzalez. President Nayib Bukele has claimed victory in the recent elections, citing ​over 85%​ of the ⁤votes. With such a significant lead, what do you think this means for the political landscape in El Salvador?

**Dr. Gonzalez:** Thank you for ​having⁢ me. Bukele’s resounding ⁢victory suggests a strong consolidation of power‍ under his administration, particularly given the controversy surrounding his re-election attempt. His‍ legal⁤ maneuver to circumvent constitutional restrictions raises ​pressing ⁢questions about‌ the rule of law in the country.

**Interviewer:** Many supporters of​ Bukele celebrate ⁣him ⁢as a transformative leader. However, his critics argue that his​ approach may undermine democratic institutions. How do​ you see this divide impacting the future of democracy in El Salvador?

**Dr. Gonzalez:** This divide is critical. On⁣ one side, you have⁢ a cohort of citizens⁢ who feel empowered​ by Bukele’s leadership and his perceived successes, such as tackling crime. On ⁢the other side, there’s a substantial concern regarding⁤ the erosion of⁣ checks⁤ and balances. If this division deepens, it could lead to further polarization and even civil unrest.

**Interviewer:** In light ​of these​ developments, what⁤ would‍ you encourage readers to consider when‌ forming their own opinions about Bukele’s presidency?

**Dr. Gonzalez:** I encourage‌ readers⁤ to ​look beyond the immediate approval ratings and charismatic leadership. ⁤Consider the longer-term implications of his‌ actions on democratic values and institutions. How do we balance ‍the desire for change with the necessity of upholding⁢ constitutional integrity? ‍This ⁣is a crucial debate for​ any⁤ democracy.

**Interviewer:** To our audience,⁢ how do you feel about Bukele’s legal maneuvering to secure a second term?‍ Do you⁤ see it as a justified strategy for progress or‍ a dangerous precedent that threatens democratic norms? Let’s hear your thoughts.