The Constitutional State, by Leonardo Abel Guy

The Constitutional State, by Leonardo Abel Guy

2024-11-17 04:20:00
The Constitutional State, by Leonardo Abel Guy

Discussing the state in a constitutional republic means maintaining an exchange of ideas under one limitation: if we discuss the state, it must be explicitly a constitutional state. That is, we invoke the founding order on which our society legally relies.

In a constitutional society, time is a historically relevant factor. The process by which constitutional states create new rules and modify or repeal existing ones often fails to meet the demands of citizens. The delay in the legislative approach to new demands from society is also a result of the procedures that initiatives have to go through to demonstrate their importance, usefulness and (no less important) empirical validation.

Countries often deal with complex problems at a different pace than expected. However, neither should regulation or deregulation of the various aspects that constitute citizen life be mandatory, the principle being to seek a reconciliation between social needs and the time required for detailed analysis.

Dictators don’t like this

The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.

Now, from a technological perspective, artificial intelligence represents a rare advancement in the history of technological advancement. Its speed not only hinders the adaptation mechanism of the law, but in some cases exceeds the correct assimilation of society. Destructive elements never seen before.

If the content generated by artificial intelligence is indistinguishable from the content produced by humans, whether it is faces, paintings, sonnets or chronicles, we are not only entering a new technological era; social era, because we can finally imitate our behavior through machines.

The possibilities this tool offers us for improving administrative processes, medical practice, research, adaptation and mitigation of climate change, and more are fascinating and promising. Likewise, its potential for excessive and incorrect use is frightening.

Perhaps, in a few years we will no longer think about what artificial intelligence can do, but what artificial intelligence should do. Many countries may decide to regulate this new technology through constitutional mechanisms. On the road to regulation, there is one main factor from which we should not deviate: the human element must be preserved in any decision involving regulatory technology, as the technology has the potential to replicate human behavior.

There is a strong need to promote approaches based on the ethical conditions of this new technology and its responsible management of human values. It is imperative, more than ever, to fundamentally rethink the opportunities and risks presented by this Pandora’s box of artificial intelligence.

*lawyer. Professor of Political Constitution and Human Rights from an International Perspective. UCES San Isidro Headquarters, Tigre Extension.

1731818909
#Constitutional #State #Leonardo #Abel #Guy

How can citizens effectively advocate for legislative changes regarding AI⁢ in a constitutional republic?

**Interview​ with Dr. ⁤Maria Lopez, Political Science ​Expert and AI ⁤Ethicist**

**Interviewer:** Thank you ‌for joining us today, Dr. Lopez. Recently, there’s been growing discourse regarding the challenges‍ faced by constitutional ⁣republics in responding to societal⁣ demands,⁤ especially in relation to technological advancements ⁢like artificial ⁤intelligence. What are your thoughts on the current ⁤state ‍of constitutional⁣ governance?

**Dr. Lopez:**‍ Thank you ⁣for having me. The crux ‌of the issue lies in the foundational principles of constitutional states. The framework they operate within⁤ necessitates a careful balance between existing regulations and‍ the ⁣rapidly evolving needs of ⁣citizens, particularly ⁢in technology. While⁤ these systems are designed to ensure stability and uphold the rule​ of law, they ⁤often struggle to adapt ⁤quickly enough ​to emerging challenges.

**Interviewer:** You​ mention the difficulty in adapting regulations. Can you elaborate on why this⁤ delay happens, particularly‌ with something as impactful⁣ as⁢ AI?

**Dr. Lopez:** Absolutely.⁣ Legislative processes​ in⁣ constitutional‍ republics ⁤can​ be cumbersome,⁣ requiring​ extensive debate and ⁣justification. This is essential to‍ ensure thorough evaluation and a democratic approach, but it can lead⁣ to a disconnect between what is​ urgent for ‍citizens and ‌what lawmakers are‍ able to address. In the case of AI, for example, the implications ​are vast and complex, but the process of creating ‍or amending laws⁢ to address these issues is ⁣often slow.

**Interviewer:** In your view, what ⁣should be ‍the approach to improve this situation?

**Dr. ⁤Lopez:** There needs to be a more agile legislative framework that still respects the principles of⁢ democracy and ‌empirical ‍validation. ⁢Perhaps establishing temporary regulations that can be tested and later ratified or modified based​ on⁢ their performance could bridge ⁢the gap‍ between immediate ⁣social needs and the legislative process. This model ‍could improve responsiveness without sacrificing the integrity of our democratic ⁣institutions.

**Interviewer:** You also‌ highlighted the importance⁤ of professional journalism in supporting democracy. How does this relate to our discussion on ⁤constitutional governance ⁤and AI?

**Dr. Lopez:** Journalism plays a critical role in holding power accountable and informing the public about both the ⁤potential and risks ‍of new⁢ technologies‌ like AI. In⁤ a healthy democracy, free⁣ and critical media serve to facilitate an informed dialogue ​among citizens ⁢and‌ their leaders. This, in turn, can accelerate⁤ the recognition⁤ and understanding of pressing ‍issues, making ​it less likely‍ for constituents’ voices to ⁤be overlooked​ by lawmakers.

**Interviewer:** Lastly, with⁣ the rapid advancement in AI technologies, how can citizens be more involved in influencing legislative ‍change?

**Dr. ⁣Lopez:**⁢ Citizens can engage in multiple ways,‌ such ‌as advocating for transparency in governmental discussions about AI, participating in public forums, or even collaborating with tech ‍experts to help demystify AI for the general public. An informed ⁣electorate is fundamental in pushing for timely legislative reform, ensuring that⁣ their interests ⁢and​ concerns are⁣ reflected ​in any new policies that emerge.

**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Lopez, for your insights on these critical issues. The ​intersection of technology and constitutional governance continues to present both ​challenges and opportunities for our ⁣society.

**Dr. Lopez:** Thank you for having this important conversation.

Leave a Replay