The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might Nayib Bukele’s approach to re-election impact future electoral processes in El Salvador?
**Interview with Political Analyst Juan Martinez on Nayib Bukele’s Re-Election Win**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Juan. President Nayib Bukele has declared victory in the recent elections with over 85% of the votes. Given that he bypassed constitutional restrictions to run for re-election, what are your thoughts on the legitimacy of his win?
**Juan Martinez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s re-election raises important questions about democratic norms and the rule of law in El Salvador. While his popularity indicates significant public support, the method he used to secure a second term may undermine the democratic process.
**Interviewer:** That’s a valid point. Some argue that this win reflects the people’s desire for continuity amid challenges. Do you believe voters are prioritizing stability over constitutional integrity?
**Juan Martinez:** Absolutely. In times of uncertainty, voters often lean toward leaders who present themselves as strong and decisive. However, we must consider the long-term implications of allowing such legal loopholes. How sustainable is a democracy if elected officials can circumvent regulations to retain power?
**Interviewer:** Interesting perspective. The other parties, like FMLN and Arena, seem significantly behind. Does this suggest a lack of viable opposition, or possibly disillusionment among the electorate with those traditional parties?
**Juan Martinez:** The striking vote difference indicates a clear frustration with the established parties. However, it also raises concerns about political pluralism. A healthy democracy thrives on competition. If other parties fail to engage voters meaningfully, we risk creating an unchallenged political landscape.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Juan. Given this situation, what do you think our readers should consider in light of Bukele’s win and its implications for democracy in El Salvador?
**Juan Martinez:** Readers should reflect on what they value more: immediate results or adherence to democratic principles. A robust debate is essential. Can we accept a system that sacrifices constitutional adherence for short-term stability? What does that mean for future governance and citizen rights?