The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might the opposition parties respond to Bukele’s legal workaround for securing his candidacy?
**Interview with Political Analyst Maria Lopez on Nayib Bukele’s Recent Election Victory**
**Editor:** Maria, thank you for joining us today. Nayib Bukele has proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections in El Salvador with an astounding 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on the implications of this victory for the country?
**Maria Lopez:** Thank you for having me. This victory is certainly significant, both for Bukele and for the political landscape in El Salvador. His ability to run for re-election, despite constitutional limitations, raises questions about the integrity of democratic processes in the country. While his popularity indicates a level of public support, one must ask: at what cost does this support come, and what does it mean for the rule of law?
**Editor:** Bukele has utilized a legal workaround to secure his candidacy. How do you think this affects public perception of the electoral process in El Salvador?
**Maria Lopez:** It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, it shows his determination to maintain power, which some supporters may see as a sign of strong leadership. On the other hand, it could lead to increased skepticism towards the electoral process and institutions. Many will question whether this signals a drift towards authoritarianism.
**Editor:** In your view, with the preliminary results showing such a clear lead over his opponents, can we expect opposition parties to challenge these results? If so, how?
**Maria Lopez:** The opposition parties, particularly the FMLN and ARENA, will likely find themselves at a crossroads. They could challenge the results through legal means, but given the current political climate, they may also consider grassroots mobilization efforts to express their dissent. However, how effective this will be remains to be seen, especially in a climate where Bukele has garnered a strong base of support.
**Editor:** considering the current political atmosphere, do you think there is a risk of polarization within Salvadoran society as a result of this election outcome?
**Maria Lopez:** Absolutely. Electoral outcomes like this often exacerbate pre-existing divides. Bukele’s overwhelming victory may lead to further radicalization among the opposition, and we could see a more fragmented society. It’s essential for leaders to foster dialogue and unity rather than deepening divisions, but that will depend largely on Bukele’s subsequent actions and policies.
**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Maria. As Bukele solidifies his position, we invite our readers to consider: Do you believe Nayib Bukele’s election victory reflects a genuine mandate from the people or is it a sign of troubling trends in democracy? Share your thoughts below.
