2024-11-15 06:09:00
Margaux Fodéré // Credits: Matthieu Delaty / Hans Lucas / Hans Lucas via AFP
modified to
8:35 a.m., November 15, 2024
After pensions and electricity, the government is backpedaling. He plans to go back on the reduction in charges. In its initial version, the text planned to increase the cost of labor at the lowest wage level.
But faced with the outcry from employers and especially from EPR deputies, the government could partially give up. By doing this, he would draw a line under certain economies and the project to “de-microcardize” France.
Indeed, exemptions from charges could well be made on remuneration at the minimum wage level. A decline which annoys Cyril Chabanier, the president of the French Confederation of Christian Workers.
“If the Prime Minister changes his mind, we will not resolve the problem of these low-wage traps and we will not succeed in ‘de-emphasisizing’. Today, we are no longer in the same context as there a few years ago, when it was absolutely necessary to reduce the unemployment rate, and therefore there was an incentive for companies to hire people at the minimum wage. Today, the question is no longer about hiring people at the minimum wage. it is to make it progress, to make them evolve,” he tells Europe 1.
Promote salary dynamics
In reality, for some experts, the government’s initial proposal was mainly aimed at replenishing the state’s coffers, rather than “de-emcardizing” France.
Discussions between parliamentarians could therefore be an opportunity to really think about it, believes Antoine Bozio, director of the Public Policy Institute. “The debate that there is today is how to ensure that we encourage salary dynamics more. That is to say, encourage salary increases when we progress in our salary career,” explains -he.
For the moment, nothing has been done. The government hopes to find a compromise in the coming days.
1731658891
#Michel #Barnier #abandons #Gabriel #Attals #idea #desmicardizing #France
What are the key reasons behind Governor DeSantis’ opposition to federal contractor mandates?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Emily Carter on DeSantis’ Continued Opposition to Federal Contractor Mandates**
**Interviewer:** Good morning, Dr. Carter. Thank you for joining us today to discuss Governor Ron DeSantis and his ongoing efforts against federal contractor mandates.
**Dr. Emily Carter:** Good morning, and thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** So, Governor DeSantis has been quite vocal in his opposition to federal mandates that affect contractors, especially in light of recent developments. Can you explain why he believes these mandates are problematic?
**Dr. Carter:** Certainly. DeSantis argues that federal mandates infringe on state rights and individual freedoms. He believes they’re an overreach of federal authority and detrimental to the economy. By opposing these mandates, he positions himself as a defender of state sovereignty and personal choice, which resonates well with his base.
**Interviewer:** Given the changing political landscape, especially with the Biden administration’s recent backpedaling on some of these mandates, how do you view the impact of these actions on DeSantis’ political capital?
**Dr. Carter:** The administration’s shift creates an interesting dynamic. On one hand, it bolsters DeSantis’ argument that federal overreach is unpopular and unwise. However, it also puts him in a position where he might need to pivot his messaging—if federal mandates are lifted, he’ll have to find new ways to rally his supporters around this issue.
**Interviewer:** Speaking of rallying support, how do you think his stance will influence his prospects in the upcoming election?
**Dr. Carter:** DeSantis’ stance plays into the larger narrative of anti-establishment sentiment and it aligns with constituents who prioritize individual liberties over federal regulations. If he can effectively frame these mandates within a broader context of government overreach, he could strengthen his appeal as a candidate poised to protect those values, particularly against politically moderate opponents.
**Interviewer:** Interesting perspective. And based on current trends, do you anticipate this issue will evolve further leading up to the election?
**Dr. Carter:** Absolutely. As we approach the election, we’ll likely see more debates around the role of federal government versus state authority. If economic concerns associated with labor costs and regulatory measures continue to emerge, the discourse around mandates like those for federal contractors could significantly impact voter sentiment.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Carter, for your insights. It’s certainly a pivotal time in politics, and it will be fascinating to see how these issues unfold.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure!