Funeral materials | Anses – National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety

Funeral materials | Anses – National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety

2021-05-07 07:07:00

Context

By decree 2006-1675 of December 22, 2006, certain expert missions of the Superior Council of Public Hygiene of France were transferred to Anses, in particular those relating to approvals for funeral materials. The General Code of Local Authorities (CGCT) specifies the area covered by these new skills:

Art. R. 2213-15. – Funeral covers; Art. R. 2213-27. – Airtight coffins and gas purifying devices.

Working method

In order to carry out this mission, a first multidisciplinary working group made up of independent scientific experts was created with a view to developing benchmarks on funerary materials.

Actions taken

In this context, ANSES has produced:

a benchmark for evaluating funeral covers and basins (July 2010). This standard meets the criteria mentioned in articles R. 2213-15 of the General Code of Local Authorities (CGCT); a standard for evaluating airtight coffins and gas purifying devices (November 2011). This reference system meets the criteria mentioned in article R. 2213-27 of the General Code of Local Authorities (CGCT).

ANSES has also published notices relating to the request to place coffins on the market. Since the publication of Decree No. 2018-966 of November 8, 2018 relating to coffins, ANSES is no longer responsible for such approval notices. Obtaining ministerial approval after consultation with Anses is now replaced by the issuance of a certificate of conformity issued by an accredited body.

Generally speaking, the General Directorate of Health (DGS) must be contacted for any information relating to the marketing of coffins, funeral covers and airtight coffins.

1731525585
#Funeral #materials #Anses #National #Agency #Food #Environmental #Occupational #Health #Safety

**Interview with Dr. Jane Thompson: Insights on Events⁤ Leading Up ​to May 2021**

**Editor:** Good morning, Dr. Thompson. Thank you for joining us today.

**Dr. Thompson:** Good morning! Thank you for having me.

**Editor:** Let’s dive right in. A lot was happening ⁢around⁣ May 2021‌ that set the stage for various global events. Can you give us some context about what‌ was significant about that time?

**Dr. Thompson:** Absolutely. By​ early May 2021, the world was grappling with the‌ COVID-19 pandemic’s ⁤aftermath.‌ In many ⁢countries, vaccine rollouts were accelerating, which brought both ‍hope‌ and challenges. We saw varying public ⁣responses ⁢to vaccination, and ⁤issues surrounding variants raised concern.

**Editor:** Yes, the vaccine rollout was ⁤a major topic. How did it affect public sentiment and⁢ the economy during that period?

**Dr. ⁢Thompson:** The availability ‌of vaccines began to ⁣shift public sentiment towards optimism, but ⁢it⁣ also highlighted vaccine inequity.⁢ Countries​ with less access struggled⁤ to control⁢ outbreaks, creating an economic disparity. The stock markets were reacting to⁣ news of successful vaccine distribution ⁣which ⁤affected investor confidence.

**Editor:** The geopolitical landscape was also influenced ⁣by this context. What were some of the key geopolitical tensions ⁣at that ⁤time?

**Dr. ​Thompson:**‍ One significant event was the‍ escalation of tensions in the Middle​ East,⁣ particularly between Israel and⁢ Hamas. This conflict drew international attention and ‌raised concerns about broader regional ‌stability. The U.S. and​ other⁤ countries faced ⁢pressure regarding their foreign ​policies and humanitarian responses during this turmoil.

**Editor:** We also saw discussions around social justice and climate change intensifying. How did these movements ⁤intersect during that ⁢period?

**Dr.⁣ Thompson:** Exactly, those two ⁢movements‌ were quite dynamic in early ⁤May 2021. ⁣Protests ⁣related⁤ to social justice‌ were fueled by ‌ongoing discussions surrounding systemic racism. Meanwhile, climate activists were increasing their momentum ahead of discussions⁣ at​ the COP26 ​conference later that ‍year.​ The interconnection between social justice and environmental issues ​became ⁣more pronounced ⁣as advocates emphasized ⁤that marginalized‍ communities often suffer‍ disproportionately from climate change ​impacts.

**Editor:**‌ It sounds like May‍ 2021 was a pivotal moment. ⁤As we reflect ‌on these events, ​what do you think ‌is the most important ⁤lesson ⁢we can take away?

**Dr. Thompson:**‍ The importance of global solidarity ‍cannot be ‌overstated. Whether ​it’s responding to a pandemic,‍ addressing climate change, or standing against social injustice, collective action‍ across borders and‌ communities⁤ is essential⁢ for meaningful change.

**Editor:** ‍Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your‌ insights. It’s clear that understanding this period‍ requires looking at the complex interactions between health, politics, and ‌social movements.

**Dr. Thompson:** Thank ⁣you⁤ for having me! ⁣It’s vital to ‍keep these conversations ‌going.

**Editor:** Absolutely. That concludes our interview for today. ‌Thank you ⁢to our​ audience for tuning in.

Leave a Replay