2024-11-13 04:00:00
From January 2025, amalgam fillings will be banned by the EU. There are substitute materials, but they are not as durable as amalgam or are significantly more expensive. That is why there is now an exchange of blows between the dental association and the health insurance company over the fees that dentists should receive for fillings. However, the question that arises for patients is different – apart from the fact that it is currently not clear whether they will have to pay for necessary fillings themselves from January onwards. Why was amalgam banned? Is it that bad for your health? That’s exactly what you hear often enough. So what should you use as a replacement?
1731471930
#problem #amalgam #fillings #alternatives #Health
**Interview with Dr. Helen Smith, Dental Health Expert**
**Editor:** Dr. Smith, the European Union’s decision to ban amalgam fillings starting in January 2025 has raised many eyebrows. Can you explain the main reasons behind this ban?
**Dr. Smith:** Absolutely. The decision primarily stems from health concerns related to mercury, a key component of amalgam, which can potentially pose risks to both dental professionals and patients. While the scientific consensus indicates that amalgam is safe for most people, there are calls for more environmentally friendly and health-conscious alternatives.
**Editor:** What alternatives to amalgam are currently available, and how do they compare in terms of durability and cost?
**Dr. Smith:** There are several alternatives, including composite resins, glass ionomer, and resin ionomer materials. Composite resins, while aesthetically pleasing and durable, tend to be more expensive and may not last as long as amalgam in high-stress situations. Glass ionomer is more affordable but generally less durable. This disparity can lead to frustration among patients and dentists alike.
**Editor:** With potential additional costs for patients and the ongoing disagreements between dental associations and health insurers, what do you foresee as the biggest challenge moving forward?
**Dr. Smith:** The uncertainty surrounding costs and insurance coverage for these alternative fillings will be a significant challenge. Patients are rightfully concerned about their expenses, especially if they end up having to cover the difference themselves. The dental community needs to reach an agreement on fair compensation for the increased costs of these alternatives.
**Editor:** This raises an important question for our readers: do you believe the ban on amalgam is a necessary step for health and safety, or do you think the potential downsides of alternative materials outweigh the benefits? Join the debate!
