November 12, 2024
From the anti-Cav judge to the red robe who hates “that angry voice” of Giorgia Meloni. Because politics against the government is carried out through ordinances, the instrument that the judiciary uses to attack political enemies, primarily the Prime Minister. The one that for the judge of the Cassation, Marco Patarnello, is more dangerous than Silvio Berlusconi, given that he does not move for a safe conduct but for a political vision that the militant judges do not like. And now a screenshot of a WhatsApp status of Antonella Marrone appears among the chats. Marrone attacked Meloni even before he won the elections, in the midst of the electoral campaign.
In fact, on 12 September 2022, the leader of the Brothers of Italy published a cult photo on social media, while accompanying her daughter Ginevra to school. «Here you are, with your huge school bag, facing the first day of primary school. We hold each other hand in hand as we face our most difficult challenges,” wrote Meloni. «Remember what I told you», continued Italy’s mother, «it won’t be anger that will give you the strength to carry on, nor ambition or ego and envy. Only love can give you the energy to never lower your head, not to get lost, not to take shortcuts. Do it with love and no one will stop you. Have a good trip, my love.” Sweet words, which were not enough to contain the pro-migrant judge’s aversion to Meloni. “Ah, isn’t it anger, ego, ambition and envy that moves her?”, wrote Marrone commenting on the photo. «Hearing her speak with that angry voice», she added, «it seemed the opposite to me but I must have been wrong…».
Video on this topic
And if Marrone is anti Meloni, his colleague Damiana Colla is anti Cav. The other signatory of the suspension rose to the forefront of the news when, in April 2021, she issued some sentences in favor of Massimo Fini, Marco Travaglio, Peter Gomez and Il Fatto Quotidiano, ruling against Silvio Berlusconi. La Colla had established that it was not defamatory to define the late leader of Forza Italia as a “criminal”, nor to call him a “terrorist, criminal, criminal” nor to write that “he threw a minor into the arms of a whore”, or that he is “suspected of having started his career as an entrepreneur thanks to money from the mafia.” Not to mention the long series of rulings in favor of illegal immigrants: he ordered a huge compensation for a migrant from the Balkan route, he agreed with a foreigner “damaged” by the long queues in front of the office for requesting international protection and granted an exceptional visa to an Afghan and his entire family.
#Migrants #judge #Albania #case #poisonous #post #Meloni #daughter #Tempo
**Interview with Dr. Antonella Leggio on Political Tensions Between the Judiciary and Government**
**Interviewer:** Today, we’re joined by Dr. Antonella Leggio, a prominent academic in political science. Dr. Leggio, thank you for being here.
**Dr. Leggio:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** The recent political landscape in Italy seems fraught with tension, particularly regarding the judiciary’s stance towards the government led by Giorgia Meloni. What are your thoughts on this growing contention?
**Dr. Leggio:** It is indeed a significant issue. The judiciary has always played a crucial role in balancing power, but we are witnessing instances where some judges openly express their disdain for political figures, especially Prime Minister Meloni. This not only creates a tense environment but also raises questions about the impartiality of the judiciary.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned the role of judges in maintaining balance. How do you assess the comments made by judges like Antonella Marrone regarding Meloni’s leadership style?
**Dr. Leggio:** Judge Marrone’s remarks highlight a troubling trend where personal sentiments may overshadow professional responsibilities. Her critique of Meloni’s “angry voice” during a politically charged environment suggests bias that should be avoided in the judiciary. This personal commentary could undermine public trust in a fair judicial process.
**Interviewer:** There seems to be a wider context involving personal relationships within the political landscape. Do you believe personal grudges or biases can affect judicial decisions?
**Dr. Leggio:** Personal feelings can heavily influence decision-making, consciously or unconsciously. If judges allow personal opinions about political figures to seep into their work, it can lead to a loss of objectivity. The public must see the judiciary as a nonpartisan body, especially in politically sensitive times.
**Interviewer:** Given the circumstances, what would you recommend to foster a healthier relationship between the judiciary and government?
**Dr. Leggio:** It is essential for both sides to engage in dialogue and perhaps create a framework for accountability. Judges should be reminded of their duty to remain impartial, while the government should strive to respect the judiciary’s independence. Transparency and open communication could help dissolve some tensions.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Leggio, for sharing your insights on this critical issue. It’s apparent that the relationship between politics and the judiciary is complex and requires careful navigation.
**Dr. Leggio:** Thank you. It’s a pleasure to discuss such important matters that shape the governance of our nation.
