According to the foreign news agency, the ongoing tension in Nagorno-Karabakh will be reduced under the agreement reached between the two countries.
Both countries confirmed the ceasefire agreement, which will be implemented from 1 am. The agreement was made at the behest of the United States, France and Russia.
According to a foreign news agency, despite the new agreement, clashes continue in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Yesterday there was a missile attack in Azerbaijan in which 10 people were killed and more than 40 were injured. Azerbaijan blamed Armenia for the missile attack, but Armenia did not accept responsibility for the attack.
It should be noted that a ceasefire was agreed between Azerbaijan and Armenia last week. A 10-hour-long ceasefire negotiation was held between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
Due to the tension between the two countries that started on September 27, more than 300 people have been killed while thousands of people have been forced to migrate.
The foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia held their first official meeting in Moscow for negotiations. The two foreign ministers held talks on the invitation of the Russian president, but despite the talks, a ceasefire could not be reached between the two countries.
#Azerbaijan #Armenia #agree #ceasefire #agreement
**Interview with Dr. Elvira Mekitarian, Geopolitical Analyst**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Mekitarian. There’s been a recent ceasefire agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia concerning the tensions in Nagorno-Karabakh. What are your thoughts on the potential effectiveness of this new agreement, especially considering the ongoing clashes?
**Dr. Mekitarian:** Thank you for having me. It’s a complex situation. While the new ceasefire is certainly a step towards de-escalation, the fact that clashes continue raises serious questions about its durability. Trust between the two nations has eroded significantly over time, and any ceasefire would require not just goodwill but structural changes in how both countries engage with each other.
**Interviewer:** Indeed, there have been calls for mediation from international powers like the U.S., France, and Russia. Do you believe that external intervention can effectively stabilize the situation, given the longstanding history of conflict?
**Dr. Mekitarian:** External intervention can help facilitate dialogue and provide necessary pressure for compliance, but it’s often a double-edged sword. The local populations may view foreign involvement with skepticism, which can further complicate peace efforts. The long history of grievances makes it essential for any mediation to truly engage the voices of the people on both sides.
**Interviewer:** The recent missile attack that claimed lives on the Azerbaijani side is a tragic reminder of the volatility in the region. How do you foresee this affecting public opinion in both countries regarding the ceasefire?
**Dr. Mekitarian:** Public sentiment is crucial in this context. In Azerbaijan, the missile attack may harden positions and foster a sentiment of retaliation, which can undermine official peace efforts. On the other hand, in Armenia, the denial of responsibility could lead to skepticism about the intentions of the Azerbaijani side. Such incidents often fuel nationalism and may derail attempts at reconciliation if the narrative shifts towards blame rather than compromise.
**Interviewer:** There’s a worry that despite diplomacy, a return to armed conflict remains possible. What should be done to ensure that this new ceasefire does not simply become a pause in hostilities?
**Dr. Mekitarian:** Building confidence is key. Both nations need to engage in comprehensive dialogue that includes not just the political elite, but also civil society. Initiatives aimed at increasing interaction between communities, addressing historical grievances, and ensuring accountability through international law could provide a firmer foundation for lasting peace.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, given the current situation, what do you think our readers should take away about the prospects for peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?
**Dr. Mekitarian:** It’s vital for the public to stay informed and engaged. Peace is often a long and difficult process, and understanding the nuances is important. Readers might consider: Is a temporary ceasefire enough for genuine peace? Does the cyclical nature of these agreements lead us to believe that conflict is inevitable? Engaging in these questions can help foster a deeper understanding of the complexities at play.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Mekitarian, for your insights on this critical issue. It’s a reminder that while agreements may be reached, the path to peace is often more complicated than it seems.
**Dr. Mekitarian:** Thank you for having me.
