We consult with our congressional partners on many issues: the U.S. Department of State;

We consult with our congressional partners on many issues: the U.S. Department of State;

Deputy Spokesperson of the US Department of State, Vedant Patel, said that we are closely monitoring the issue of Imran Khan’s arrest. We consult with our congressional partners on many issues

During a press briefing in Washington, PTI Chairman’s arrest and cipher were questioned, to which Vedant Patel said that we are closely monitoring the arrest of Imran Khan and this matter, will not speak about any particular case. .

Vedant Patel said that as we are heard talking, we consult with our Congress partners on many issues.

Earlier, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said that the US does not involve itself in the internal political affairs of any country and we do not support the political parties of Pakistan or any other country.

Mathew Miller had said that the cases against politicians are an internal matter of Pakistan, democratic principles must be respected.

On the other hand, US Ambassador to Pakistan Donald Bloom held separate meetings with Caretaker Chief Minister Mohsin Naqvi and IG Punjab Dr Usman Anwar in which they discussed the protection of human rights and respect for the rule of law.

During the meeting, they discussed opportunities to increase US trade and investment, respect for democracy and the rule of law, including the importance of protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms of religious minorities.

#consult #congressional #partners #issues #U.S #Department #State

**Interview with Vedant Patel, Deputy ‍Spokesperson of the US Department of State**

**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Vedant. Given the recent developments surrounding Imran Khan’s arrest, can you elaborate on the extent to which the US ⁢is monitoring this situation? ‌

**Vedant Patel:** Thank you for having me. As I mentioned during our press briefing, we are closely monitoring the arrest of Imran Khan. However, it’s important to clarify that we will not comment on specific cases as this⁤ is an internal matter for Pakistan. We engage‍ with our congressional partners on various issues, but ​our stance remains that we do not interfere in the internal⁢ political affairs of any country.

**Interviewer:** That brings us to an important point made by your colleague, Matthew ‌Miller, about ​respecting democratic principles. Do you believe that the US’s position on non-interference might be perceived as⁢ indifference by the people of Pakistan, especially ⁢in light of political turmoil?

**Vedant Patel:** It’s crucial to strike a balance. Our position⁣ is rooted‌ in supporting democratic processes and human‌ rights. ‍We believe that ⁤respect for democratic principles and the⁣ rule of law are essential. While we may not support individual political parties, we advocate for a fair political⁤ process that allows for the voices of all citizens to be heard.

**Interviewer:** In⁣ your ⁤meetings⁤ with local leaders like Caretaker Chief Minister Mohsin Naqvi, how receptive have they been to discussions on human rights and the rule of law?

**Vedant‌ Patel:** The⁤ meetings have been ‍constructive. There’s a⁣ mutual understanding of the importance ⁢of maintaining human ⁣rights ‌and upholding the ⁢rule of law. Discussing trade ⁣and investment opportunities alongside ​these principles demonstrates our commitment to enhancing bilateral relations.

**Interviewer:** What do you⁤ think the American public and international community should understand about the complexity of US-Pakistan relations in the context of political arrests like that of Imran Khan?

**Vedant Patel:** It’s important for the ⁢public to recognize that international⁤ relations are multifaceted. While we uphold democratic values, we also have to‍ respect the sovereignty of nations. The⁤ complexity⁤ comes from navigating these principles while fostering positive relations. It invites debate about where one draws the line in⁣ foreign engagements.

**Interviewer:**⁤ Absolutely,​ it raises an important point for ‍discussion. What are your thoughts, readers? Should⁢ the⁣ US ‌take a more proactive stance on political issues in Pakistan, or is​ non-interference the ‍best approach? Let us ⁤know what you think!

Leave a Replay