2021-07-01 05:34:00
Whether they cause a respiratory allergy or are toxic in the event of ingestion or skin contact, the list of 58 plants at risk for health established by ANSES and the National Aerobiological Surveillance Network is available on the website : plantes-risque.info.
For each plant, the risks involved, the toxic parts of the plant, the possible clinical signs in the event of exposure and the measures to be taken in the event of poisoning are detailed.
Since July 1, 2021, merchants have the obligation to inform consumers of the toxicity of certain plants sold commercially or on the internet and of the precautions to take to avoid any poisoning. Customers are informed via a label or poster placed near the plant.
In case of severe disorders or vital distress occurring after ingestion of part of the plant, contact with it or inhalation of its pollen, call 15 or 112. Call a veterinary poison control center in case of poisoning of your animal.
1731362904
#Plants #sold #commercially #health #risks #Handles
**Interview with Dr. Sophie Martin, horticultural toxicologist**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Martin. We’ve recently learned about the list of 58 plants identified as health risks by ANSES and the National Aerobiological Surveillance Network. What do you think this means for plant consumers and the gardening community?
**Dr. Martin:** It’s a significant development. The obligation for merchants to inform consumers about the toxicity of these plants is a crucial step in preventing potential health issues. Awareness is key—many people underestimate the risks associated with certain plants in their homes and gardens.
**Editor:** With such a wide range of plants classified as risky, how can consumers differentiate between safe and hazardous options when shopping?
**Dr. Martin:** Education is vital. Consumers should actively seek information—beyond labels and posters, they can consult the list available at plantes-risque.info. Understanding the specific risks associated with each plant will empower them to make informed choices.
**Editor:** Given this new regulation, do you think it’s enough to protect consumers? Or should there be stricter guidelines or penalties for merchants who fail to comply?
**Dr. Martin:** While this is a positive step, I believe there should be ongoing monitoring and potentially stricter penalties for non-compliance. Education alone may not be enough; accountability is essential to ensure that both consumers and pets are safe from toxic plants.
**Editor:** What do you think readers believe about this balance between consumer education and merchant responsibility? Should consumers take the initiative to learn more, or should the onus be on retailers to ensure safety?
**Dr. Martin:** That’s a critical debate. I think many readers may feel it’s a collective responsibility—retailers must provide clear information, but at the same time, consumers should engage in proactive learning to safeguard their health and that of their pets.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Martin. It will be interesting to see how readers respond to these challenges and responsibilities.