Jokowi is said to have contacted all party leaders to discuss the asset confiscation bill

Jokowi is said to have contacted all party leaders to discuss the asset confiscation bill
Illustration of Asset Forfeiture Bill(Doc.MI)

PRESIDENT Prabowo Subianto is committed to continuing President Joko Widodo’s legacy so that the Draft Law (RUU) on Confiscation of Criminal Assets can be immediately passed by the DPR RI. Nevertheless, the former Head of the Center for Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis (PPATK), Yunus Husein, has given sanctions if the DPR for the current period wants to immediately discuss it.

An expert on money laundering (TPPU) from the University of Indonesia is of the opinion that politicians’ words often do not match their real actions. When appointed as Chair of the Team for the Acceleration of Legal Reform for the Prevention and Eradication of Corruption under the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Mahfud MD, Yunus even asked Jokowi about the fate of the bill.

According to Yunus, Jokowi had said that he had contacted all political party leaders so that the Asset Confiscation Bill could be discussed immediately.

“Jokowi said, ‘I have contacted all the party leaders. Everything is okay to discuss, but it turns out it doesn’t work. Maybe gentlemen can help encourage it,’ he said,” said Yunus to Media Indonesia, Saturday (9/11).

Reflecting on this, Yunus concluded that the direction of a president is sometimes not always in line with what is carried out by parliament. He reminded that the Asset Confiscation Bill is a good instrument to prevent corrupt practices.

The reason is that the proposed regulations will not only focus on the proceeds of crime that can be confiscated, but also on the legal basis for someone to be able to prove that they have improper assets or wealth. In practice, Yunus said that people with illegitimate wealth must provide the best possible proof of their assets.

“There is reverse evidence there. So people don’t want to carelessly enrich themselves because one day they could be asked to prove their Tax Return or LHKPN by law enforcement,” explained Yunus.

“If it is discovered, it can be confiscated as the proceeds of a criminal act,” he concluded. (Tri/M-4)

#Jokowi #contacted #party #leaders #discuss #asset #confiscation #bill
**Interview with Yunus Husein: Insights on the Asset ​Confiscation Bill**

**Editor:** Good afternoon, Yunus. Thank you for joining us today to discuss⁤ the pressing issue⁣ of the Asset ⁣Confiscation Bill. As an expert on money laundering and former Head of PPATK,​ what are your thoughts on⁣ President Prabowo Subianto’s commitment to continue President Joko Widodo’s legacy ‍in this‌ matter?

**Yunus Husein:** Good afternoon, ‍and ⁣thank you for having ‌me. I believe​ President‌ Prabowo’s commitment is a ‍positive step towards ensuring ⁢that the Asset Confiscation ⁢Bill ​is prioritized. This legislation is ⁢crucial ⁢for strengthening our financial‍ integrity ⁣and combating​ corruption. However, ⁤the real ⁣challenge lies in the ‍actions ‌of the lawmakers, which have often been⁤ inconsistent with their ​commitments.

**Editor:** You mentioned concerns about⁢ the action versus ⁣words of politicians. Can you ⁤elaborate on why you ⁣feel this way and the potential ⁣consequences of such discrepancies?

**Yunus Husein:** Certainly. Throughout my career, I’ve observed that many political ⁤figures express strong support for anti-corruption measures ​during campaigns⁤ or⁤ public appearances, but ​their‌ motivations can⁣ shift once they are in office. This gap can lead to ‌stagnation in passing⁢ essential laws like the Asset Confiscation Bill. If the DPR does not act swiftly, we risk losing the momentum for change and allowing corruption to prevail​ unchecked.

**Editor:** You’ve hinted at potential sanctions if the DPR wants to rush discussions‍ on this bill. What ‌do you mean by that?

**Yunus⁤ Husein:** What‍ I​ mean is‍ that while urgency is important, it​ must not compromise the‌ integrity of the⁢ legislative process. Rushing the discussion could lead to poorly designed policies that might not be effective in achieving the intended outcomes. Instead, there⁢ should be a thorough analysis and dialogue involving various stakeholders to ensure‌ the law is robust⁤ and comprehensive.

**Editor:** As a final thought, ‌what‌ do you hope to see from the government and lawmakers ‍regarding this bill in the⁤ near future?

**Yunus Husein:** ⁣I hope to see a unified effort from both the executive and legislative branches to prioritize this legislation. It’s not just about passing a bill;⁣ it’s ⁢about creating​ a framework that enables effective law enforcement ⁣against corruption and financial crimes. Transparency and⁣ accountability should be at the forefront of their agenda. Only​ then can we truly honor the legacy ⁢of those who have fought against corruption in our country.

**Editor:** Thank⁤ you, Yunus, for sharing your insights ⁣with us.⁤ It will​ be interesting to see ⁢how this develops in the coming weeks.

**Yunus Husein:** ⁣Thank you ​for having me. I hope for positive progress on this front.

Leave a Replay